Probability for particle in infinite square well

AI Thread Summary
A particle confined in an infinite square well of width L=0.189 nm is evaluated for its probability in specific intervals while in the second excited state (n=3). The probability is calculated using the wave function ψ(x) and the formula P(X)=abs(ψ(x)^2)dx. The initial calculations yielded incorrect results due to confusion over units and the need to multiply by the interval width, dx. The correct unit for L was confirmed to be nanometers, which resolved the discrepancies in the answers. Ultimately, understanding the importance of unit conversion and the correct application of dx led to accurate probability results.
pinkfishegg
Messages
57
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A particle is confined between rigid walls separated by a distance L=0.189. The particle is in the second excited state (n=3). Evaluate the probability to find the particle in an interval of width 1.00 pm located at
a)x=0.188nm
b)x=0.031nm
c)x=0.79nm
What would be the corresponding results for a classical particle[/B]

Homework Equations


P(X)=abs(ψ(x)^2)dx
ψ(x)=(√2/L)*(sin(nπx/L)

The Attempt at a Solution


for part a
P(x)=(2/.189)*(sin(3π(.0188))/.189))^2=.28/m

I know the probability is just a matter of squaring ψ but my answer is way off. The got 2.63*10^-5 for part A. My first through was why does my answer have units of 1/m. I'm guessing i should multiply by dx. I thought this may be 1.00 pm but simply multiplying my answer by 10^-12 won't get the job done. Am i getting some variables mixed up here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the units of L? Are they in meters? Micrometers? Or even nanometers?

That is what you have to find out!
 
JorisL said:
What are the units of L? Are they in meters? Micrometers? Or even nanometers?

That is what you have to find out!
oh its L=0.189nm
 
Does that fix your problem?

When I figured it out (trial and error) I immediately got the right answer.
 
JorisL said:
Does that fix your problem?

When I figured it out (trial and error) I immediately got the right answer.

Silly me i kept my calculator in radians instead of degrees. But anouther not is that the dx is actually something you need to multipy by, not just some kind of notation. was getting 2.6*10-2 until i realized i needed to multiply by 10^-12 m. thanks for the help
 
Awesome.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top