Problem : electric field due to line charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field due to a non-conducting rod with a uniform negative charge distribution. The original poster seeks to determine the electric field at a specific point near the midpoint of the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula for the electric field of an infinite line charge, but questions arise regarding the correct interpretation of the charge per unit length.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the definition of λ (charge per unit length) and its application in the formula. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to calculate λ from the total charge and length of the rod.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on adhering to forum rules against providing complete solutions, and the discussion reflects on the original poster's misunderstanding of the formula rather than the formula itself.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

Homework Statement


A non conducting rod of length 2.2 m carries a negative charge of 3.8 ×10^-7 spread uniformly over it's length .What is the magnitude of electric field near the mid point of the rod at a perpendicular distance 3.6 mm from the rod?

Homework Equations



E=λ/2πε0r

The Attempt at a Solution


As it has been given that we have to calculate electric field near the mid point of the rod ;we can use the formula of infinite line charge for our rod of finite length (i.e 2.2m)
using formula
E=λ/2πε0r
E=2λ/ 4πε0r
PUTTING VALUES
=9 ×10^9 ×2 ×3.8 ×10^-7/3.6 ×10^-3
=19 ×10^5 N/C
but the answer should be 8.6 ×10^5 N/C
where I am getting wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
λ is the charge per unit length on the rod, not the total charge of the rod.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Orodruin said:
λ is the charge per unit length on the rod, not the total charge of the rod.
But there is λ in formula not total charge.
gracy said:
E=λ/2πε0r
 
gracy said:
But there is λ in formula not total charge.
I don't understand what you are trying to say. As Orodruin posted, the lambda in the formula you quote represents the charge per unit length. To use the formula, you must first calculate that from the given charge and length information.
 
haruspex said:
I don't understand what you are trying to say. As Orodruin posted, the lambda in the formula you quote represents the charge per unit length. To use the formula, you must first calculate that from the given charge and length information.
oh!yes,sorry.
 
Answer is this E=λ/2πε0r
λ=unit charge =total charge÷length
=3.8×10^7/2.2=1.7×10^-7
Now putting all values in formula you wipl get answer 8.6×10^5N/C
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
This thread is two years old and the OP already had the correct formula, just not the correct understanding of it.

Also, please remember the PF rules against posting full solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K