Problem interpreting this interference question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zomboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
AI Thread Summary
The homework question involves two pieces of optically flat glass separated by a thin metal foil, creating a wedge that leads to interference patterns when light is incident on it. The thickness of the foil is 0.0700 mm, and the wavelength of the light is 529 nm. The confusion arises from interpreting the setup, but it is clarified that the interference fringes result from the varying air gap between the two glass plates. Understanding this concept is crucial for solving the problem and calculating the number of interference fringes per cm in the reflected light. The discussion highlights the challenges of grasping the physical setup in interference questions.
Zomboy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

"A thin piece of metal foil of thickness 0.0700mm separates one end of two pieces of optically flat glass. The top sheet is 12.0cm long. Light of wavelength 529nm is normally incident on the glass. How many interference fringes are observed per cm in the reflected light?"

I don't really understand this question. I'm amusing that the 12cm glass pane is placed (possibly end on) on top of the second (infinitely large) pane, separated by an infinitely large sheet of (opaque/reflective) thin metal foil...

If someone could decode this question for me it would be much appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Like you, I couldn't make sense of it, but gneill explained it:
Two flat glass plates, one end of the pair is separated by a distance of 0.0700 mm. Thus they form a wedge. Interference will ensue...
 
That makes so much sense. Sometimes when tackling some of these questions I feel like a 3yr old playing with a bunch of shaped blocks trying to cram a stupid square one into that smug *** circular hole. Not my finest moment.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top