Problem using Newton's 2nd Law F= m x A

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the maximum speed of a ball on a string using Newton's second law and the relationship between tension, mass, and gravitational force. The initial attempt at the solution incorrectly omitted the breaking tension in the denominator. Through collaboration, the user learns to apply the concept of similar triangles to relate the radius and string length, leading to the correct formulation. The final equation for maximum speed is established as V = square root of L (T² - M²g²) / (MT). This highlights the importance of accurately incorporating all forces and relationships in physics problems.
Bob K99
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A ball whirling on the end of a string, length L
Maximum tension in string before it breaks: T sub break
Find an equation for the maximum speed of the ball , V sub max, in terms of the ball's mass, M, the breaking
tension T sub break, and the gravitational acceleration g

Ignore the angle theta the string makes with the horizontal plane

Homework Equations


F= mass times acceleration
Acceleration = m x v squared / r (radius)

The Attempt at a Solution


I used algebra and the Pythagorean theorem to get
v = the square root of L x ( T squared - M squared x G squared ) / M
but the correct answer is V = the square root of L x ( T squared - M squared x G squared) / M x T
I cannot figure out how the T sub break showed up in denominator
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bob K99, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Can you show your work in detail? We can't tell where things might have gone wrong without seeing what you did.

Note that you can use the x2 and x2 icons in the edit window menu bar to produce subscripts and superscripts for formulas.
 
Bob K99 said:

Homework Statement


A ball whirling on the end of a string, length L
Maximum tension in string before it breaks: T sub break
Find an equation for the maximum speed of the ball , V sub max, in terms of the ball's mass, M, the breaking
tension T sub break, and the gravitational acceleration g

Ignore the angle theta the string makes with the horizontal plane

Homework Equations


F= mass times acceleration
Acceleration = m x v squared / r (radius)

The Attempt at a Solution


I used algebra and the Pythagorean theorem to get
v = the square root of L x ( T squared - M squared x G squared ) / M
but the correct answer is V = the square root of L x ( T squared - M squared x G squared) / M x T
I cannot figure out how the T sub break showed up in denominator [/B]

As "gneill" has suggested, you can use the "x2" and "x2" buttons (in the grey ribbon at the top of the input panel) to produce xanything or xanything. However, you can also do it in plain text by writing x^{anything} or x_{anything}, which can be shortened to x^a and x_a if your "anything" is a single letter or digit "a".
 
Okay I will try to use the menu bar.

I had to make some assumptions in my solution and my high school algebra and trig are a bit rusty so bear with me

I formed a right triangle with the ball and string. The hypotenuse is T ( tension of string ) , the vertical leg of the right triangle is the weight of
the ball or mass times gravity. The horizontal leg of triangle is centripetal force F
So F2 = T2 - m2 x g2F2 =( mass X velocity2 / r )2 Equation 1

It is at this point that my math starts to break down
Ideally to get the posted answer I should get the equation
F = m x v2 / r = T2 - (m x g)2 substitute Length of string L for R
V2 = L ( T2 - (m x g )2 / M
V = square root of L ( T2 - M2 X G2 / M Equation 2

However I ignored the fact that F2 = ( m X v2 /r )2 in equation 1

Also the correct answer has M (mass) x T (tension of string at break) in the denominator equation 2

Correct answer is V = square root of L x ( T2 - M2 x G2) divided
by M x T

Possibly I should have broken the problem down to 2 equations
1) Equation for forces on ball Using F & T

2.) Equation for Distance Using length L and radius r

Then substitute a variable to get 1 equation
 
Last edited:
Okay. Note that L and R are not the same thing, so directly substituting one for the other is invalid.

Here's a diagram that depicts the situation:

upload_2016-3-2_9-48-24.png


The tension and centripetal force vectors have had their directions reversed so that they project past the end of the ball for convenience; It's the angles and magnitudes that are important to us. You should be able to use similar triangles to find a relationship between r and L that will allow you to replace r in your equations.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
gneill said:
Okay. Note that L and R are not the same thing, so directly substituting one for the other is invalid.

Here's a diagram that depicts the situation:

View attachment 96711

The tension and centripetal force vectors have had their directions reversed so that they project past the end of the ball for convenience; It's the angles and magnitudes that are important to us. You should be able to use similar triangles to find a relationship between r and L that will allow you to replace r in your equations.

Yes, you are right about r and L not being equal I will try your suggestion and keep working on it.
Thanks
 
Thanks to gneill I think I figured the problem out Since we have similar triangles the sides are proportional ( see his diagram above)

T2 = (mg)2 + (mv2)2 / r2 Law of right triangles

T2 - m2 g2 = m2 v4 / r2 Eq 2

Similar triangles r/ mv2 /r =L /T this simplifies to R2 /mv2 = L/T

Substituting for r2 in eq 2 will give L ( T2 - m2 g2) / MT = v2

V = square root of L ( T2 - m2 g2 ) / M T

Voila
 
Last edited:
Back
Top