Problem when calculating the center of mass of a triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass of a triangle using two different methods: the 2/3 theorem and vector addition. The user encounters discrepancies in results from both methods, leading to confusion about the validity of their calculations. They express uncertainty about whether both methods should yield the same outcome, especially since the problem involves lengths rather than areas. Other participants suggest that the problem may not be as complex as it seems and recommend using linear equations to solve for the medians. The user seeks clarification on the correct approach to find the center of mass, acknowledging potential misunderstandings in their calculations.
Kampret
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if the black dot is assumed by (0,0).find the center of mass coordinate of this triangle
a>
[/B]
i'm sorry but since the pic won't show ill attach the link here
https://ibb.co/4Ptw5T7

<Moderator's note: picture added>
rps20190125-174702.jpg


Homework Equations


centroid is 2/3 of median [/B]
using vector addition

The Attempt at a Solution


the problem is when i try solve this problem by both method it always give me different answer first I'll use the 2/3 theorem first
~ by seeing the picture it shows us that the length of EF is 2√2(2/sin45) and length from D to midpoint(H) is √2 ,[/B]
EH √2 then the length of center of mass from point D, ⅔DH or ⅔√2 from here i turn this into x-axis by multiply it by cos 45(since 90 on point D split into half) so i get ⅔√2.½√2 it become ⅔ this is the length from right side (point D) but the problem demand it from left side (black point) so it become 2-⅔=4/3(x axis)
for y-axis is using same method and it will give also 4/3result
~and the second method is using vector addition and have form like (x1m1+x2m2)/(m1+m2) in my case (x1l1+x2l2)/(l1+l2) since it doesn't show any mass and just length , and I am sure most you already know about this method
so ill straight to my attempt
for x-axis (x1l1+x2l2+x3l3)/(l1+l2+l3)
where 1= ED 2=EF 3=DF
(1.2+1.2√2+2.2)/(2+2√2+2)=1.292
and exact same method for y axis
and give same result, and from here the problem is arises , now if we take a look 1.292 is length from left side to right (from black point 0,0) so it length from point D is 2-1.292=½√2 so for y-axis it length from point D is 2-1.292=½√2 then if we use phytagorean theorem on both result we should able to determine the length from point D to the centrium ( i already calculated it on method 1) so it turned out like this √((½√2)²+(½√2)²)=1 and the answer should be ⅔√2 and if we try further more the length from D to mid point is 1/(2/3)=1,5 and how can there become 1,5??
sorry if i use weird term since I am not native english speaker so I'm not familiar with it i , ill really glad if someone can explain this to me since both formula is valid at least so i think
 

Attachments

  • rps20190125-174702.jpg
    rps20190125-174702.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 700
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know where the center of mass of any triangle should be at, just with basic geometry?
 
Kampret said:
since it doesn't show any mass and just length
There's the problem. Lengths are not areas.
 
YoungPhysicist said:
Do you know where the center of mass of any triangle should be at, just with basic geometry?

YoungPhysicist said:
Do you know where the center of mass of any triangle should be at, just with basic geometry?
i don't say any type of triangle. if you open the link you will see it only ordinary triangle
 
Kampret said:
i don't say any type of triangle. if you open the link you will see it only ordinary triangle
Well, I mean this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_center
It just seems like this problem isn’t that complicated. The medians can be considered as linear equations. Then solve the system.

For instance:
The median from point D to line EF is y=x
 
YoungPhysicist said:
Well, I mean this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_center
It just seems like this problem isn’t that complicated. The medians can be considered as linear equations. Then solve the system.

For instance:
The median from point D to line EF is y=x
yes it just when i try both method it doesn't display same result so it leave me restless since i think both are valid equation but I'm not sure about the second since so far in problem lIke this is always give either mass of area just like what haruspex stated above . frankly it first time i learn about center of mass so the density is always same and it basically give me the generic equation that also applicable to area and when i try to match it with my knowledge about triangle centrium it just give more contradiction . but it also perhaps caused by my shallowness and mistakes, so if i the one that make mistake please show me the right things to do but if both method really doesn't show same result then I'm not in the position to talking about it
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top