Problem with normalisation, or should i say integration

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Consider the wave packet \psi(x)\equiv ψ(x, t = 0) = Ce^{i\omega x}e^{-\left|x\right|/2\Delta x} where C is a normalisation constant.

Normalise \psi(x) to unity.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I know the normalisation condition. My problem is when I have ...

\left|C\right|^{2}\int e^{-\left|x\right|/\Delta x} dx = 1

Any help will be MUCH appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:

Homework Statement



Consider the wave packet \psi(x)\equiv ψ(x, t = 0) = Ce^{i\omega x}e^{-\left|x\right|/2\Delta x} where C is a normalisation constant.

Normalise \psi(x) to unity.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I know the normalisation condition. My problem is when I have ...

\left|C\right|^{2}\int e^{-\left|x\right|/\Delta x} dx = 1

Any help will be MUCH appreciated.


Say delta x=x-x0
 
Good thinking! But this makes the problem even harder . lolzz. because I have literally NO idea how to integrate such an expression!
 
failexam said:
Good thinking! But this makes the problem even harder . lolzz. because I have literally NO idea how to integrate such an expression!

Thank U! I just got lost like U did, but my professor gave this idea.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top