Projectile Motion: Finding the Angle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a toy gun that propels a steel ball using a spring. The objective is to determine the angles at which the ball can be aimed to hit a target located 3.00 m away at the same height as the gun. Participants are analyzing the physics of projectile motion, energy conservation, and the kinematics involved in the trajectory of the ball.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of energy conservation to find the initial velocity of the ball and explore the breakdown of velocity into components. There are attempts to derive equations for both horizontal and vertical displacements, with some questioning the assumptions made regarding the projectile's trajectory. Others suggest reconsidering the equations used for vertical displacement and the impact of gravity on the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some have pointed out the need to incorporate gravitational effects into the equations, while others are exploring different methods to relate the angles and distances involved. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, and various interpretations are being examined without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that the vertical displacement is zero when the ball hits the target at the same height as the gun. There are also mentions of potential misunderstandings regarding the trajectory and the use of kinematic equations, highlighting the need for clarity in the assumptions made during calculations.

Jazz
Messages
103
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



A toy gun uses a spring with a force constant of ##\small{300 N/m}## to propel a ##\small{10.0\!-\!g}## steel ball. If the spring is compressed ##\small{7.00\ cm}## and friction is negligible:

At what angles above the horizontal may a child aim to hit a target ##\small{3.00\ m}## away at the same height as the gun?

Data:

##m = 10.0 \times 10^{-3}\ kg##

##k = 300\ N/m##

##x = 7.00 \times 10^{-2}\ m##

##Range = 3.00\ m##

Homework Equations



##PE_{spring} = \frac{1}{2}kx^2##

##KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2##

##v^2 = v_0^2 - 2gh##

##\bar{v}t = d##

The Attempt at a Solution



It's assumed conservation of energy in order to find the initial velocity:

##\Delta PE_{spring} = \Delta KE##

##\sqrt{\frac{kx^2}{m}} = v##

##v= 12.1\ m/s##

Then I broke the velocity and the displacement into their components (I skipped the units for simplicity). I used just half of the range, hence I took ##\small{d = 1.50\ m}##:

image.jpg
##\sin(\theta) = \frac{y}{x} \Rightarrow x\sin(\theta) = y##

##\cos(\theta) = \frac{1.50}{x} \Rightarrow x = \frac{1.50}{\cos(\theta)}##

##y = 1.50\tan(\theta) \hspace{35pt}(1)##

I wanted to know the height (y) the ball reached:

##v^2 = v_0^2 - 2gy##

##y = \frac{(12.12\sin(\theta))^2}{(2)(9.8)} = 7.50\sin^2(\theta) \hspace{35pt}(2)##

Combining equations ##(1)## and ##(2)##:

##1.50\tan(\theta) = 7.50\sin^2(\theta)##

##\cos(\theta)\sin(\theta) = \frac{1}{5}##

##2\cos(\theta)\sin(\theta) = \frac{2}{5}##

##\sin(2\theta) = \frac{2}{5}##

##2\theta = \arcsin(\frac{2}{5})##

##\theta = 11.79º\ or\ 78.21º##

Then by finding the time I wanted to comprobe whether the results I got are corrects. The time it took the ball to reach its maximum height, its horizontal displacement should have been ##\small{d = 1.50\ m}##:

##t= \frac{v\sin(\theta)}{g}= \frac{(12.12\ m/s)\sin(11.79º)}{9.8\ m/s^2} = 0.253\ s##

##v\cos(\theta)t = d##

##(12.12\ m/s)\cos(11.79º)(0.2527\ s) = 3.00\ m##

I don't know why I get this horizontal displacement. I expected to get ##\small{d = 1.50\ m}## and not the whole range.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've just discovered that the formula ##\small{range = \frac{v^2\sin(2\theta)}{g}}## is a more straightforward way to solve this problem :) ; but I still don't know what I'm doing wrong above.

At the beginning, I had mistakenly taken the work done by the spring as ##Fx##, which yielded a greater velocity that fits the 5.77-degree angle needed for a 3-m range, but the components of the velocities are overestimated, giving me the same problem as the one above.
 
Jazz said:
Then I broke the velocity and the displacement into their components (I skipped the units for simplicity). I used just half of the range, hence I took d=1.50 m\small{d = 1.50\ m}:

proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fs29.postimg.org%2Frh6m0p2d3%2Fimage.jpg
sin(θ)=yxxsin(θ)=y\sin(\theta) = \frac{y}{x} \Rightarrow x\sin(\theta) = y

cos(θ)=1.50xx=1.50cos(θ)\cos(\theta) = \frac{1.50}{x} \Rightarrow x = \frac{1.50}{\cos(\theta)}

y=1.50tan(θ)(1)y = 1.50\tan(\theta) \hspace{35pt}(1)

In your triangle on the right you've assumed that the projectile will follow a straight-line path at angle θ This is not so! While the launch angle may be θ, the projectile follows a parabolic trajectory.

Your triangle for breaking the initial velocity into its components is okay.
 
Yep, your triangle on the right is incorrect as gneill said. Your calculation of initial velocity looks okay.
vcos(θ)t=d=3m is for horizontal displacement.What is the equation for vertical displacement when the ball hits the target at the same height as the gun?
 
Thank you, @gneill and @lep11, for answering.

]: True. The triangle is not taking into account the action of ##\small{g}## as the math part does. So I'm left without triangle there. It makes sense.

lep11 said:
What is the equation for vertical displacement when the ball hits the target at the same height as the gun?

I hope not to be confusing something, but the displacement in the vertical direction should be zero after hitting the target at the same height as the gun, shouldn't it?

Your help has helped to see where, I think, I was wrong. If a consider just half of the path, when the vertical velocity becomes zero, then an equation for the vertical displacement (that I'd called ##\small{y}##) is:

##y = \bar{v}t##

##y = \frac{v\sin(\theta) + 0}{2}t##

##y = \frac{v\sin(\theta)}{2}t \hspace{35pt}(1)##

Since half of the range, ##\small{d = 1.50\ m}##, was traveled in ##\small{t}## at ##\small{v\cos(\theta)}##, then:

##v\cos(\theta)t = d##

##t =\frac{d}{v\cos(\theta)} \hspace{35pt}(2)##

##y = \left(\frac{v\sin(\theta)}{2}\right) \left(\frac{d}{v\cos(\theta)}\right)## <--- Combining equations ##(1)## and ##(2)##

##y= \frac{d\tan(\theta)}{2}##

That is ##\small{y}## and not ##d\tan(\theta)##. Basically I had mistakenly taken the max. height traveled at constat ##\small{v\sin(\theta)}##, which in turn meant having changed just one side of the equation when I was trying to solve the problem.
 
Jazz said:
Thank you, @gneill and @lep11, for answering.

]: True. The triangle is not taking into account the action of ##\small{g}## as the math part does. So I'm left without triangle there. It makes sense.
I hope not to be confusing something, but the displacement in the vertical direction should be zero after hitting the target at the same height as the gun, shouldn't it?

Your help has helped to see where, I think, I was wrong. If a consider just half of the path, when the vertical velocity becomes zero, then an equation for the vertical displacement (that I'd called ##\small{y}##) is:

##y = \bar{v}t##

##y = \frac{v\sin(\theta) + 0}{2}t##

##y = \frac{v\sin(\theta)}{2}t \hspace{35pt}(1)##

Since half of the range, ##\small{d = 1.50\ m}##, was traveled in ##\small{t}## at ##\small{v\cos(\theta)}##, then:

##v\cos(\theta)t = d##

##t =\frac{d}{v\cos(\theta)} \hspace{35pt}(2)##

##y = \left(\frac{v\sin(\theta)}{2}\right) \left(\frac{d}{v\cos(\theta)}\right)## <--- Combining equations ##(1)## and ##(2)##

##y= \frac{d\tan(\theta)}{2}##

That is ##\small{y}## and not ##d\tan(\theta)##. Basically I had mistakenly taken the max. height traveled at constat ##\small{v\sin(\theta)}##, which in turn meant having changed just one side of the equation when I was trying to solve the problem.
You have left g out of your equations.Which kinematics equation relates acceleration=g, displacement, time, and initial velocity to each other?
 
Last edited:
lep11 said:
You have left g out of your equations.Which kinematics equation relates acceleration=g, displacement, time, and initial velocity to each other?

I guess it should be ##y = v\sin(\theta)t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2##.
 
Jazz said:
I guess it should be ##y = v\sin(\theta)t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2##.
You are right.
 
Last edited:
Using a geometric reasoning for finding ##y## wasn't good at all |: .
 
  • #10
y= y0+vsin(θ)t−0.5gt^2 now y=y0 so you can write 0=vsin(θ)t−0.5gt^2 (where t is the total flight time of the ball)

0=vsin(θ)t−0.5gt^2
vcos(θ)t=d=3m
Can you now solve for θ? You have two equations and two unknowns.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
lep11 said:
y= y0+vsin(θ)t−0.5gt^2 now y=y0 so you can write 0=vsin(θ)t−0.5gt^2 (where t is the total flight time of the ball)

0=vsin(θ)t−0.5gt^2
vcos(θ)t=d=3m
Can you now solve for θ? You have two equations and two unknowns.

Well, now I can see what you've been trying to show me. It never came to my mind to use the equation for y along the whole trajectory.

This should be:

##0 = v\sin(\theta)t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2##

##\frac{1}{2}gt^2 = v\sin(\theta)t \hspace{25pt}| \hspace{25pt} v\cos(\theta)t = d##

##\frac{1}{2}gt = v\sin(\theta) \hspace{33pt}| \hspace{35pt} t = \frac{d}{v\cos(\theta)}##

##\left(\frac{1}{2}g\right)\left(\frac{d}{v\cos(\theta)}\right) = v\sin(\theta)##

##\frac{gd}{v^2} = 2\cos(\theta)\sin(\theta)##

##\frac{gd}{v^2} = \sin(2\theta)##

##\theta = \frac{\arcsin\left(\frac{gd}{v^2}\right)}{2}##

##\theta = \frac{\arcsin\left(\frac{(9.8\ m/s^2)(3.00\ m)}{(12.12\ m/s)^2}\right)}{2} = 5.77º##

Not that bad (:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K