Projectile Motion: Height of hammer thrown downwards

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics homework problem involving the height of a hammer thrown downward at 4.6 m/s from a height of 9.5 m after 0.75 seconds. A participant seeks validation of their calculations, which were generally correct but highlighted the importance of not rounding intermediate values too early to avoid significant figure errors. The thread title was also modified for clarity, emphasizing the specific problem rather than a general topic. Proper handling of significant figures and clear thread titles are crucial for effective problem-solving in physics discussions. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of precision in calculations and clear communication in academic forums.
aatari
Messages
73
Reaction score
3
Hey Guys, I have attempted the question below and need someone to check my work, please.

Thanks!

1. Homework Statement

If the hammer was tossed downward at 4.6 m/s from a height of 9.5 m above ground level, how high would it be after 0.75 s?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


20170224_173634[545].jpg

[/B]
 
  • Like
Likes Agyaba Hope
Physics news on Phys.org
Your result turned out okay. However, you should avoid rounding intermediate values to the number of significant figures. Keep a few extra digits in intermediate values, and only round your results at the end. Otherwise, rounding/'truncation errors will creep into your significant figures by the end of the calculations.

I'm changing your thread title to make it more descriptive of the problem being asked. Too-general thread titles, such as "Projectile motion" are not allowed as it is impossible to differentiate one such thread from another by thread title.
 
  • Like
Likes Agyaba Hope and aatari
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top