Projectile motion in 1 dimension problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a projectile motion problem involving a stone thrown vertically upward from a 30.0 m high bridge with an initial velocity of 15.0 m/s. Participants clarify the correct use of kinematic equations, emphasizing the importance of consistent sign conventions for acceleration and distance. It is noted that when using a negative acceleration due to gravity, the distance should also be negative, or both can be positive as long as they match in sign. The stone first ascends until it stops, then descends back to the bridge before hitting the water, necessitating a two-part analysis of its motion. Understanding the sign conventions for acceleration and distance is crucial for accurately solving such problems.
toddler
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi, having trouble with the following problem:

A stone is thrown vertically upward from a bridge 30.0m high at an initial velocity of 15.0 m/s . How long will it take for the stone to hit water?


I set it up first by writing my givens down:
initial velocity = 15.0 m/s.
distance (x) = 30 m ( I'm not sure if its positive or negative since its coming back down)
Acceleration = -9.8 m/s squared (negative because its force coming down against gravtiy)

used kinematic equation : X= Intial velocity (time) + 1/2 at squared

i'm not getting the answer 4.44 that I am supposed to be getting..pleast help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
used kinematic equation : X= Intial velocity (time) + 1/2 at squared
That's part of it.

Let's think about what is happening.

The stone is launched vertically with an intial velocity 15 m/s. So the stone travels upward until it stops, because it is decelerating with gravity.

What is that time?

Then the stone falls, in the same amount of time, back to the bridge. It must be then traveling at 15 m/s downward (it's falling) past the bridge (elevation where it started), and then continuing falling another 30 feet (the height of the bridge above the water).
 
my teacher said that if i make Acceleration a negative (-9.8), then i have to make the distance X negative also, which would be (-30) ... or you can make both positive,...as long as they are set up with the same sign, it will work out...

is this true?
 
toddler said:
my teacher said that if i make Acceleration a negative (-9.8), then i have to make the distance X negative also, which would be (-30) ... or you can make both positive,...as long as they are set up with the same sign, it will work out...

is this true?
Not in all cases. If the object was just falling, e.g. one drop a rock, then the distance would be negative if one used x = -1/2 g t2. BTW, this is relative meaning the - sign indicates a decrease in elevation.

In the case where an object has an initial vertical velocity, it is gaining elevation (altitude) as it decelerates. In this case, the distance x, would be positive, that is until the projectile falls back to its initial elevation and continues to fall, as is the case in this problem.

The other approach would be to determine the height of the projectile at its maximum (and the time that it takes), then determine the time that it would fall from that point to the point of interest.
 
thank you astronuc, you cleared up the distance portion for me, i can visualize in my head now...but for the A=9.8, when is it negative and when is it positive...i'm still unsure about that
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top