Projectile Motion on a Slope: Calculating Distance Traveled

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lord Anoobis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile Slope
AI Thread Summary
An archer on a 15-degree slope shoots an arrow at a 20-degree angle with an initial speed of 50 m/s from a height of 1.75 m. The calculations for the distance the arrow travels down the slope initially yielded a result of 294.7 m, which differs from the book's answer of 297 m. It was identified that the initial height of 1.75 m was not initially considered, and adjusting for this height resolved the discrepancy. Additionally, the discussion explored whether rotating the coordinate system to level ground would simplify calculations, concluding that it would not without also adjusting for the direction of gravitational acceleration. The conversation emphasized the importance of accounting for initial height in projectile motion problems.
Lord Anoobis
Messages
131
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


An archer standing on a 15 degree slope shoots an arrow 20 degrees above the horizontal. How far down the slope does the arrow hit if it is shot with a speed of 50m/s from 1.75m above the ground?

Homework Equations


[/B]
##y = x##tan##\theta## - ##\frac{gx^2}{2v^2 cos^2\theta}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I took the slope the archer is standing on to be a line through the origin of the x-y coordinate system, thus intersecting the trajectory of the arrow at two points, one being (0, 0). The slope this line is then

##y = -(tan15^o)x##

Setting the equations equal to each other and punching in values I obtained

##-(tan15^o)x = xtan20^o - \frac{9.8x^2}{5000cos^2 20^o}##

##x = \frac{(tan15^o + tan20^o)(5000cos^2 20^o)}{9.8}##

with x = 284.7 and y = -76.28 giving a final distance of 294.7m. The actual answer is 297m according to the book. I've been over this calculation a few times and it is clear that another set of eyes is required to shed some light on this conundrum. Please assist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you take care of the fact that the arrow is shot from 1.75 m above the ground?
 
A=g.
initial upward velocity = sin(20)*50.
initial y = 1.75
x=cos(20)*50*t
y=-.5*a*t^2+vo*t+yo
yarrow=-.5*9.8*t^2+sin(20)*50*t+1.75

yslope= mx+b
yslope= tan(-15)*x+0
yslope=tan(-15)*cos(20)*50*t

yslope=yarrow
tan(-15 deg)*cos(20 deg)*50*t=-.5*9.8*t^2+sin(20 deg)*50*t+1.75

t=6.118s.
x=cos(20)*50*6.118
x=287

I tried. It's possible the book has a typo.
 
Lord Anoobis said:
I've been over this calculation a few times and it is clear that another set of eyes is required to shed some light on this conundrum. Please assist.
You don't seem to have taken into account the initial height of 1.75 m.

(TSny beat me to it.)
 
TSny said:
Did you take care of the fact that the arrow is shot from 1.75 m above the ground?
It seems I did not, and shifting the curve upward by 1.75m does indeed solve the problem.
Something else though. Initially I thought about rotating the system so that the ground is level and the launch angle is 35 degrees. Am I correct that this would not work? If one considers say, the same 15 degree slope and a launch angle of 75 degrees, rotating would simply send the arrow straight up, not so?
 
Lord Anoobis said:
It seems I did not, and shifting the curve upward by 1.75m does indeed solve the problem.
Something else though. Initially I thought about rotating the system so that the ground is level and the launch angle is 35 degrees. Am I correct that this would not work?

Right. It would not work unless you also rotated the direction of the acceleration of gravity.

If one considers say, the same 15 degree slope and a launch angle of 75 degrees, rotating would simply send the arrow straight up, not so?

That's right (assuming gravity still acts vertically)
 
TSny said:
Right. It would not work unless you also rotated the direction of the acceleration of gravity.
That's right (assuming gravity still acts vertically)
Of course. I didn't consider that, but I can see now that going about it that way wouldn't be simpler at all, seeing that compensating for the direction of gravitational acceleration would result in a horizontal component thereof as well.
Thanks for the help.
 
Back
Top