Projectile motion (time cut in half)

AI Thread Summary
When a tennis ball is shot horizontally from building A to building B, reducing the distance between the buildings to half results in the ball hitting building B at a height of 3/4H from the ground. The time taken for the ball to travel horizontally is halved, which affects the vertical motion. The correct equation for vertical displacement is Δy = ½at², leading to a new calculation that shows the ball falls a quarter of the height, thus hitting at 3/4H. The reasoning presented is sound and aligns with the principles of projectile motion. This conclusion effectively demonstrates the relationship between horizontal distance and vertical displacement in projectile motion scenarios.
reshmaji
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two buildings A & B are each of height H as measured from the ground & are located a distance L apart. A tennis ball is shot horizontally with a velocity vo from building A such that it just hits the bottom of building B before hitting the ground. If building B is moved to half the distance (1/2)(L) & the ball is launched with the same horizontal velocity, where on building B does it hit the side, measured from the ground?

Homework Equations


I think they are:
x-xo = (vocos(theta))t
y-yo = (vosin(theta))t - 1/2(g)t2

The Attempt at a Solution


Where the ball would be at L/2 = x/2 & results in t/2 because x is proportional to time in the equation.
So apply half the time to the y-axis equation, but since it's 2 terms with different degrees of t (one is t1, the other t2) I'm not sure what I can assert about how this effects y.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just realized that the y-axis won't use the equation I posted, the y-axis is a one dimensional motion... I'll try this again
 
Okay, is this correct:
We can deduce that it'll be half the time from my reasoning in the first post.
the y-axis equation we need to use is: Δy = vot + ½at2
since vo = 0, Δy = ½at2,
if we apply t/2 we get Δy = ½a(½t)2 =(¼)½at2, so we'll end up with ¼*Δy, giving us 3/4H from the ground.

Is this all sound reasoning?
 
reshmaji said:
Okay, is this correct:
We can deduce that it'll be half the time from my reasoning in the first post.
the y-axis equation we need to use is: Δy = vot + ½at2
since vo = 0, Δy = ½at2,
if we apply t/2 we get Δy = ½a(½t)2 =(¼)½at2, so we'll end up with ¼*Δy, giving us 3/4H from the ground.

Is this all sound reasoning?
Looks good!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top