Projectile Motion Unusual Problem

AI Thread Summary
A body thrown upward at an angle θ passes through two points at the same height h at times t1 and t2. The challenge is to calculate the initial velocity v0 and height h using projectile motion equations. The discussion highlights that since the heights at t1 and t2 are equal, two equations can be formed to solve for v0 in terms of the known variables. It is suggested to consider the vertical launch speed required to maintain the object's flight duration between t1 and t2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate equations for solving constant acceleration problems.
Georgiana.B
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A body which is thrown upward from the ground at an angle θ passes through 2 points situated at height h at times [t][1] and [t][2] from launching.Calculate the initial velocity [v][0] and the height h.

Homework Equations


The equation of motion for a projectile motion:
x(t)= [x][0]+ [V][0](t-[t][0])- g/2[(t-[t][0])][2]
V=[V][x] * cosθ +[V][y] * sinθ

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that since the body passes through the 2 points which are situated at the same height at time [t][1] and [t][2], at means that y([t][1])=y ([t][2]). So, by replacing it in the formula above mentioned with [V][y] * sinθ as [V][0], i tried to get [V][0] with respect to time,but that doesn't seem to help since i have no numbers to relay on.Could anyone please share any ideas of solving?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Georgiana.B said:

Homework Statement


A body which is thrown upward from the ground at an angle θ passes through 2 points situated at height h at times [t][1] and [t][2] from launching.Calculate the initial velocity [v][0] and the height h.


Homework Equations


The equation of motion for a projectile motion:
x(t)= [x][0]+ [V][0](t-[t][0])- g/2[(t-[t][0])][2]
V=[V][x] * cosθ +[V][y] * sinθ

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that since the body passes through the 2 points which are situated at the same height at time [t][1] and [t][2], at means that y([t][1])=y ([t][2]). So, by replacing it in the formula above mentioned with [V][y] * sinθ as [V][0], i tried to get a express [V][0] with respect to time,but that doesn't seem to help since i have no numbers to relay on.Could anyone please share any ideas of solving?

Hi Georgiana.B, Welcome to Physics Forums.

If you have the general equation of motion for the y-direction and two solution pairs [h,t1] and [h,t2], then you can write two equations involving all the given variables. See if you can't then solve for Vo in terms of the given variables. You should be able to eliminate h from the Vo solution, too :wink:

Note that your solution will involve variables t1, t2, θ, and constant g.
 
Georgiana.B said:
y([t][1])=y ([t][2]). So, by replacing it in the formula above mentioned with [V][y] * sinθ as [V][0], i tried to get a express [V][0] with respect to time,but that doesn't seem to help since i have no numbers to relay on.
You know more than merely the two heights are the same. You know that height equals h. Your answer will be in terms of h.
 
A better question would be,which are other ways of solving this kind of problems?
 
Georgiana.B said:
A better question would be,which are other ways of solving this kind of problems?
Depends what you mean by 'this kind of problem'. If you mean constant acceleration problems then the SUVAT equations, such as you quoted, are the natural choice. The trick, often is to pick the most useful for the question. Of the usual five variables - distance, acceleration, time, start velocity, end velocity - each equation references four. Typically you know three and want a fourth, which tells you which equation to use.
In some problems there can be a quicker way, perhaps using symmetry.
In the present problem, you could start by finding the vertical launch speed needed to keep an object in the air for time t2-t1. From that, you can easily find the vertical speed needed when launched from h lower down.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top