Projectile Explosion: Finding the Larger Mass's Landing Spot

AI Thread Summary
A projectile explodes at a distance L into two masses, 1/4 and 3/4, with the smaller mass landing back at the origin. To determine where the larger mass lands, conservation of momentum and the symmetry of projectile motion can be applied. By expressing the initial velocity algebraically, one can derive the time of flight after the explosion in terms of initial velocity components and L. This allows for the calculation of the larger mass's landing point using its post-explosion horizontal velocity. Overall, while specific numerical results require additional information, an algebraic solution is feasible.
h.a.y.l.e.y
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a problem where I am told a projectile explodes at a distance L (in the x direction) into 2 pieces of masses 1/4 and 3/4. The smaller mass lands back at the origin. Where does the larger mass land?

I have tried CofM arguments but think I need to find the time it takes to reach the top of its trajectory in order to find how long it takes for the masses to land. By the way, I am not told the angle it is fired at.
Could someone enlighten me further please...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
h.a.y.l.e.y said:
I have a problem where I am told a projectile explodes at a distance L (in the x direction) into 2 pieces of masses 1/4 and 3/4. The smaller mass lands back at the origin. Where does the larger mass land?

I have tried CofM arguments but think I need to find the time it takes to reach the top of its trajectory in order to find how long it takes for the masses to land. By the way, I am not told the angle it is fired at.
Could someone enlighten me further please...

If you take advantage of the symmetry of projectile motion, conservation of momentum will tell you the change in velocity of both objects at the point of explosion in terms of the velocity just before the explosion . If you write the initial velocity algebraically, you can express the vertical height and the velocity in terms of horizontal postion, x, and initial velocity components, eliminating time from the equations. You are correct that to get a numerical result you would need more specific information, but you can get an algebraic result for the time of flight after the explosion in terms of the initial velocity components and L. Using that time, and the post-explosing horizontal velocity you can calculate the landing point of the larger mass. The algebra gets a bit involved, but there is nothing worse than solving a quadratic equation.
 
With no external forces acting, momentum is conserved:

m\vec{v_i} = m\vec{v_f}

What Dan's saying is that the center of mass' momentum will continue to travel in the same direction, so if it breaks into two pieces,

m_1\vec{v_i} + m_2\vec{v_i} = m_1\vec{v_f} + m_2\vec{v_f}

In the above equation, you know the left hand side, and th first term on the right hand side.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top