Propagation of Uncertainty with Angles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the propagation of uncertainty in angle calculations derived from distance measurements in an experiment. The user is unsure how to propagate uncertainties through their calculations involving the tangent and sine of angles. A formula for error propagation is provided, indicating that the uncertainty in a function can be derived from the uncertainties in its variables. Example calculations demonstrate how to compute the uncertainty in the angle based on the given distances and their respective uncertainties. Ultimately, the user concludes that the uncertainty in their calculations is 0.01, reflecting the limits of precision in their measurements.
TheJuke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I conducted an experiment which involves measuring two distances (Y and L) and have used tan to determine the angle, then finally calculated the sine of the angles for use in my analysis.

I have uncertainties in both length measurements and am unsure how to propagate the uncertainties the way through.


Homework Equations


Unsure of what equation to use here.


The Attempt at a Solution


Unsure where to start really.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What level of mathematics have you taken? If you've taken multivariable calculus, it will be really simple to explain.
 
I am currently taking multivariable calculus so that would be great
 
If δf is the uncertainty of a function of f(x1,x2,...,xn) each with error δxi, then the most general equation for the error is (\delta f)^2=\sum_{i=1}^n(\delta x_i \frac{\partial f}{\partial x})^2. If you want a derivation, I would recommend reading Introduction to Error Analysis by Taylor.
 
Thanks so much, I think I have it.

Would you mind having a look over my calculations? I am 100% sure of them as I would expect a far greater error.



Example Calculations:
θ=arctan(6/28)
θ=0.21 radians
sinθ=0.21

Propagation of Uncertainty:
Let r= y/L
∆r= (√((∆y/y)^2+ (∆L/L)^2 ))r
θ=arctan(r)
∆θ=(d(arctan(r))/dr) ∙ ∆r
∆θ(1/d)= 1/(r^2+1) (√((∆y/y)^2+ (∆L/L)^2 ))r

At smallest value:
∆θ(0.5)= 1/((6/28)^2+1) (√((0.25/6)^2+ (0.1/28)^2 ))(6/28)
∆θ=0.00857
∆θ=0.01
At maximum value:
∆θ(0.5)= 1/((18/28)^2+1) (√((0.25/18)^2+ (0.1/28)^2 ))(18/28)
∆θ=0.00652
∆θ=0.01
Therefore the uncertainty in all calculations is 0.01 as this is the limit of the precision in the original measurements.
 
I would have used 0.009 and 0.007 for the two accuracies. Propagation of uncertainty is one of the few cases where I would recommend plugging in numbers at every step. That is because
\frac{\delta r}{\sqrt{r^2+1}}
is easier to calculate than
\frac{\sqrt{\left(\frac{\delta y}{L}\right)^2+\left(\frac{y\times\delta L}{L^2}\right)^2}}{\sqrt{\left(\frac{y}{L}\right)^2+1}}
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top