Proton Scattering: Calculating Current Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter madeinmsia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton Scattering
madeinmsia
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


50uA beam of 1MeV proton
Target = Iron of 0.05um thick
Calculate scattered current density at distance 5 cm at 20 degrees angle

Homework Equations


\sigma(E,\theta) = \pi*Z_{1}Z_{2}e^{4}(M_{1}/M_{2})/ET^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured the probability of scattering to the angle is \frac{\int^{20}_{20}\sigma(E,\theta)d\Omega}{\int^{\pi}_{0}\sigma(E,\theta)d\Omega}

Then how do i find the scattered current density with the info I have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression you've written down will give you an answer of 0 (zero) - since the probability of scattering exactly into a specified angle will be zero (as you can see from the limits of your integral)...but the probability density will not be zero. You need to find the current density, which is proportional to the probability density.

So, the correct term in the numberator is: \sigma(E,\theta=20)

In any case, I don't know what the terms in the given equation represent, and I don't see where the angular dependence (I expect there should be a 1-cos\theta factor somewhere) is embedded.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top