Prove equation in Green's function.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294

Homework Statement



Green's function G(x_0,y_0,x,y) =v(x_0,y_0,x,y) + h(x_0,y_0,x,y) in a region \Omega \hbox { with boundary } \Gamma. Also v(x_0,y_0,x,y) = -h(x_0,y_0,x,y) on boundary \Gamma and both v(x_0,y_0,x,y) \hbox { and }h(x_0,y_0,x,y) are harmonic function in \Omega

v=\frac{1}{2}ln[(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2]




Let u be continuous and h is harmonic on an open disk around (x_0,y_0) in \Omega. Show that

_r\stackrel{lim}{\rightarrow}_0 \int_{C_r} u\frac{\partial h}{\partial n} ds = 0

Hint from the book: Both |u| and |\frac{\partial h}{\partial n}| are bounded near (x_0,y_0), say by M. If I_r denotes the integral in question, then |I_r| \leq 2\pi M r \rightarrow 0 \hbox { as } r\rightarrow 0

Homework Equations



Green's 1st identity:

\int _{\Omega} ( u\nabla^2 h + \nabla u \cdot \nabla h ) dx dy = \int_{\Gamma} u \frac{\partial h}{\partial n} ds




The Attempt at a Solution



h=-v \hbox { on } \Gamma \Rightarrow\; \int _{\Omega} ( u\nabla^2 h + \nabla u \cdot \nabla h ) dx dy = -\int_{\Gamma} u \frac{\partial v}{\partial n} ds = -\int_{\Gamma} u \frac{1}{r} ds = -\int^{2\pi}_{0} u d\theta

h is harmonic in \Omega\;\Rightarrow \nabla^2 h = 0

\Rightarrow\; \int _{\Omega} \nabla u \cdot \nabla h \; dx dy = -\int^{2\pi}_{0} u d\theta
I really don't know how to continue, please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
h = -v on Γ. You're not integrating over Γ; you're integrating around a small circle Cr around (x0, y0). You haven't said what h is, but by the hint, presumably ∂h/∂n is bounded on some disk centered at (x0, y0). This is certainly not true if h = -v on this disk, as ∂v/∂n = 1/r is not bounded. If h has no singularity at (x0, y0), then certainly ∂h/∂n is bounded on such a disk, as h has a continuous derivative (since by assumption h is harmonic).

Apply the hint.
 
adriank said:
h = -v on Γ. You're not integrating over Γ; you're integrating around a small circle Cr around (x0, y0). You haven't said what h is, but by the hint, presumably ∂h/∂n is bounded on some disk centered at (x0, y0). This is certainly not true if h = -v on this disk, as ∂v/∂n = 1/r is not bounded. If h has no singularity at (x0, y0), then certainly ∂h/∂n is bounded on such a disk, as h has a continuous derivative (since by assumption h is harmonic).

Apply the hint.

Thanks for you help, let me try this:

Let u be continuous and h is harmonic on an open disk around (x_0,y_0) in \Omega. Show that

_r\stackrel{lim}{\rightarrow}_0 \int_{C_r} u\frac{\partial h}{\partial n} ds = 0

Hint from the book: Both |u| and |\frac{\partial h}{\partial n}| are bounded near (x_0,y_0), say by M. If I_r denotes the integral in question, then |I_r| \leq 2\pi M r \rightarrow 0 \hbox { as } r\rightarrow 0

So |u| \hbox { and } |\frac{\partial h}{\partial n}|\; \leq\; M. As (x,y)\rightarrow\;(x_0,y_0)

_r\stackrel{lim}{\rightarrow}_0 \int_{C_r} u\frac{\partial h}{\partial n} ds = \;^+_- M^2\; \int^{2\pi}_{0} r\;d\theta \;=\; _r\stackrel{lim}{\rightarrow}_0 \; (2\pi M^2r) \;=\; 0

I have M^2 \hbox { because } u\frac{\partial h}{\partial n} \leq M^2
 
Yes. Now you have to prove that both |u| and |∂h/∂n| are bounded near that point.
 
adriank said:
Yes. Now you have to prove that both |u| and |∂h/∂n| are bounded near that point.

Thanks for your time. But I got M^2 instead of M. It does not matter because r goes to zero.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top