Prove peicewise function is or is not onto.

  • Thread starter Thread starter teroenza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I am told to prove or disprove whether the following function is 1:1 and onto.

f(x)= x if x is rational
x^2 if x is not rational

The Domain and Range are both given as [0,1]

I have provided a counter example to show it is not 1:1. x=1/2 and sqrt(0.5) both map to 0.5.

I am stuck on onto. If I am to disprove it being onto, I need to find/show
there is a b in the range
such that there is no a in the range
for which (a,b) is an element of f(a). I am confused as to where to begin to formulate this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teroenza said:
I am stuck on onto. If I am to disprove it being onto, I need to find/show
there is a b in the range
such that there is no a in the range
for which (a,b) is an element of f(a). I am confused as to where to begin to formulate this.

Why are you trying to disprove it , when you can prove it.
Take any 'b' in the co-domain and show that there is an 'a' in the domain such that f(a) = b.By the way this thread does not belong to the Advanced Physics sub-forum. You should have posted it here - https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=156 , i.e in the Calculus and Beyond forum.
 
Last edited:
Thank you.

Apologies for the mislabeling.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top