Proving ab - a - b + 2 > 1 in Simple Algebra: Tips and Hints

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Proof
AI Thread Summary
To prove that ab - a - b + 2 > 1 for a > 1 and b > 1, it can be rewritten as ab - a - b + 1 > 0. This simplifies to a(b - 1) - b + 1 > 0, which can be rearranged to -a(b - 1) + b - 1 < 0. The final form shows that (b - 1)(1 - a) < 0, indicating the relationship between a and b. This transformation clarifies the proof and highlights the conditions under which the inequality holds true.
Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I need to prove that for every a > 1 and b > 1 the following holds:

ab - a - b + 2 > 1

Can someone please throw me some hints? :)

Thanks,
Chen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's equivalent to proving

ab - a - b + 1 > 0
<=>
a(b - 1) - b + 1 > 0
<=>
-a(b - 1) + b - 1 < 0
<=>
(b - 1)(1 - a) < 0.
 
Argh, I was close but didn't see that! Thanks. :-)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top