darkfeffy said:Thinking it might just be an assumption that this last term is exceedingly small compared to the first.
You are correct in that the term is exceedingly small (zero is an exceedingly small number). You are incorrect in that is an assumption.darkfeffy said:Thinking it might just be an assumption that this last term is exceedingly small compared to the first.
Thanks Dick.Dick said:Do you know Euler's formula, e^(ix)=cos(x)+i*sin(x) (i the imaginary unit, not the integer index)? That would let you treat the sum of the cos term as the real part of the sum of a geometric series. And no, there's no approximation here. The cos part really does sum to zero.
Thanks DH for your brilliant reply which really doesn't add much information :-)D H said:You are correct in that the term is exceedingly small (zero is an exceedingly small number). You are incorrect in that is an assumption.