Proving Existence of Zero with Least Upper Bounds

andilus
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



sup problem
if f is continuous on [a,b] with f(a)<0<f(b), show that there is a largest x in [a,b] with f(x)=0

Homework Equations

i think it can be done by least upper bounds, but i dun know wat is the exact prove.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing that there is one x in [a,b] such that f(x) = 0. Then form the set
S = \{x \in [a,b] | f(x) = 0\}
You have already shown that S is non-empty and you know that it's bounded, so it must have a supremum. Let
x_0 = \sup\,S
Since x_0 is an upper bound for S, if we can show x_0 \in S we have shown that it's the largest element in S. So all you need to do is show x_0 \in S. The easiest way to do this is to assume x_0 \notin S, i.e. y_0 = f(x_0) \not= 0. Now since f is continuous at x_0 we can find some \delta &gt; 0 such that if x \in (x_0-\delta,x_0 + \delta) then f(x) \in (0,2y_0) (let \epsilon = |y_0|). Now x_0 - \delta is an upper-bound for S, but less than x_0.
 
but how to prove x0 is in [a,b]?
 
i seem to know...
if x0<a, obviously wrong.
if x0>b, we can find some x such that b-\delta<x<b satisfying that x is upper bound of the set.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top