Proving Faraday's Law Using Stokes Theorem: A Differential Equation Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Proof
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
stokes theorem says \int_{S} (\nabla \times G) \bullet dA = \oint_{C} G \bullet ds where C is a closed curve bounding the open surface S. Note : dA =n dA, and ds = t ds

use stokes theorem to prove that hte Faraday law of induction \oint_{C} E \bullet t ds = -\frac{d}{dt} \int_{S_{C}} B \bullet n dA can be written as a differential equation \nabla \times E + \frac{\partial B}{\partial t} = 0

now i can easily rearrange the left hand side of the integral equation to get \int_{S_{C}} (\nabla \times E) \bullet dA = - \frac{d}{dt} \int_{S_{C}} B \bullet n dA
now I am not allowd to 'cancel' out the dA terms can i ? Or perhaps find the gradient on each side?? Please help on this!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, that first integral should be over the surface SC. Then you can bring the d/dt inside the integral on the right, and argue that since this equality must hold for any region of integration, the integrands must be equal (otherwise, you could focus the integral over the region where they weren't equal and you'd get that the integrals weren't equal).
 
crossing out the dA's would not make sense, I hope you realize that.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top