Proving Inequality for Complex Numbers with Absolute Value Constraints

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality involving complex numbers constrained by their absolute values. Participants initially misstate the inequality and struggle with the mathematical proof, suggesting various approaches such as using polar coordinates and squaring both sides. Corrections are made regarding the direction of the inequalities, leading to the correct form: √(7/2) ≤ |z+1| + |1-z+z²| ≤ 3√(7/6). Some users share numerical tests and graphical analysis to explore the bounds, ultimately concluding that the inequality holds true under specific conditions. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the collaborative effort to arrive at a solution.
Brunno
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hi fellows,



Homework Statement




Prove that:


\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}\leq|z+1|+|1-z+z²|\leq\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}}

for all complex numbers with |z|=1.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried something like this:

Starting by the following property:

-|z|\leqRe(z)\leq|z|

but i could'nt get anywhere.


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hellllllp! Please!:)
 
Have you tried squaring both sides of the inequality?
 
Yes:

7/2<= |t²+2tu+u²|<=63/6

But from here i can't go anywhere.I don't know from where to start to prove it.:(

where t=(z+1) and u=(1-z+z²)
 
Last edited:
Hi Brunno! :smile:

I can't see a neat way of doing it :redface:

You could try putting z = cosθ + isinθ, z2 = cos2θ + isin2θ.

Or maybe use 1 - z + z2 = (1 + z3)/(1 + z).

(I haven't tried either of them)
 
Hi,
I tried the second one but still doesn't seem to make it easier.How to solve it by the non neat way?
 
Brunno said:
\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}\leq|z+1|+|1-z+z²|\leq\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}}

for all complex numbers with |z|=1.
This is a relatively minor point, but the direction of your inequalities is going the wrong way. For one thing you are saying that sqrt(7/2) <= sqrt(7/6), which isn't true.

Also, your inequality will look better if you use just a single pair of tex and /tex tags.

Here's your inequality in cleaned up form, with the correction noted above.

\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}} \leq |z+1|+|1-z+z^2| \leq \sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}

Click the inequality to see what my LaTeX script looks like.
 
Mark44,thanks.I didn't notice it.Yes it's not sqrt(7/6) but actually 3sqrt(7/6).
 
Anyone willing to help me on this one?;(
 
  • #10
Brunno said:
Yes:

7/2<= |t²+2tu+u²|<=63/6

But from here i can't go anywhere.I don't know from where to start to prove it.:(

where t=(z+1) and u=(1-z+z²)

That "t2+2tu+u2" is better written in terms of z as...

(z2+2)2

That might also make it easier.
 
  • #11
So it should be something like:

7/2<=(z²+2)²<=63/6

I still can't see any further...:cry:
 
  • #12
HeLLLLP People!:)
 
  • #13
Brunno said:
HeLLLLP People!:)

Well, there's a few things wrong with the above.

For starters, |t²+2tu+u²| is not correct. It should be |t|²+2|tu|+|u|².

This makes (z²+2)² the wrong direction to take.

I've simply tried to fill in a couple of values for z.
With z = 1, we get |z+1|+|1-z+z²| = 3 > sqrt(7/2)

This is out-of-range, so the conclusion is that the original statement is false.
Qed.
 
  • #14
I like Serena said:
I've simply tried to fill in a couple of values for z.
With z = 1, we get |z+1|+|1-z+z²| = 3 > sqrt(7/2)

This is out-of-range, so the conclusion is that the original statement is false.
Qed.

This is incorrect. Looks like you missed post #8:
Brunno said:
Mark44,thanks.I didn't notice it.Yes it's not sqrt(7/6) but actually 3sqrt(7/6).

So
\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} \leq |z+1|+|1-z+z^2| \leq 3\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}}
is the correct inequality, and if you substitute in z = 1 the inequality holds.
 
  • #15
get it in polar form z=e^(i*\alpha)
 
  • #16
eumyang said:
This is incorrect. Looks like you missed post #8:


So
\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} \leq |z+1|+|1-z+z^2| \leq 3\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}}
is the correct inequality, and if you substitute in z = 1 the inequality holds.

True, I missed that one. Thanks for the correction.

I've gone on and filled in a few more numbers (since the equation is oddly difficult to solve).

Code:
arg z   (|z+1|+|1-z+z²|)²
π/3       3                        < 7/2
5π/6     10.56                     > 3² . 7/6 = 21/2
Again I find numbers that are out-of-range on both sides of the equation.
Did I miss something else?

Btw, I used Excel to find these numbers, which must be close to the minimum and maximum values.

[EDIT]Here's the graph I plotted
complex_inequality.jpg
[/EDIT]
 
Last edited:
  • #17
That should not be (5π/6,10.56), but rather (2Arccos(1/4),10.5625).
 
  • #18
lurflurf said:
That should not be (5π/6,10.56), but rather (2Arccos(1/4),10.5625).

So how did you find it?
 
  • #19
lurflurf said:
That should not be (5π/6,10.56), but rather (2Arccos(1/4),10.5625).

I've verified it with WolframMathematica (cool site :cool:)!

I'm concluding that the equation should be:

\sqrt 3 \leq |z+1|+|1-z+z^2| \leq \frac {13} {4}

I've solved this by taking the square, deriving it to phi, and setting the result to zero:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...sin(2x)+-+6+sin(3x)+/+sqrt(2+++2+cos(3x))+=+0

It finds the solutions 0 and 4 arctan sqrt(3/5).
Checking some more teaches me that 4 arctan sqrt(3/5) = 2 arccos 1/4 = 2 arctan sqrt 15.

Checking out pi and pi/3 learns that they are solutions as well.

So we have the following extrema:

\begin{matrix}<br /> z &amp; |z+1|+|1-z+z^2| \\<br /> \hline<br /> 1 &amp; 2 \\<br /> \pm \frac \pi 3 &amp; \sqrt 3 \\<br /> \pm 2 \arccos \frac 1 4 &amp; \frac {13} 4 \\<br /> \pi &amp; 3 \end{matrix}
 
Last edited:
  • #20
let t=arg(z) with the usual convention -pi<t<=pi then by elementary trigonometry
|z+1|+|z^2-z+1|=a[2 cos(t/2)+(1/2)a]^2-(13/4)a
where
a=-1 when |t|=<pi/2
a= 1 when |t|>=pi/2

there will be local extrema when
2 cos(t/2)=0 ->t=0
a changes ->|t|=pi/3
2 cos(t/2)=1/2 ->|t|=2 Arccos(1/4)
2 cos(t/2)=1 ->t=pi
 
  • #21
lurflurf said:
let t=arg(z) with the usual convention -pi<t<=pi then by elementary trigonometry
|z+1|+|z^2-z+1|=a[2 cos(t/2)+(1/2)a]^2-(13/4)a
where
a=-1 when |t|=<pi/2
a= 1 when |t|>=pi/2

there will be local extrema when
2 cos(t/2)=0 ->t=0
a changes ->|t|=pi/3
2 cos(t/2)=1/2 ->|t|=2 Arccos(1/4)
2 cos(t/2)=1 ->t=pi

Nice solution!
I feel stupid for not seeing it myself.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top