Proving Riemann Integral: Non-Negative f(x)=0 $\rightarrow \int^{b}_{a}f=0$

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Riemann
danielc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Suppose f(x):[a,b]\rightarrow\Re is bounded, non-negative and f(x)=0. Prove that \int^{b}_{a}f=0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to use the idea that lower sums are zero, and show that the upper sums go to zero as the norm of the partition goes to zero. That is Upper sums \leq c||P|| such that \int^{\overline{b}}_{a}f=0.

how can I prove that statement by using the idea above with the choice of c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that f is the zero function? I.e identically zero? (I only ask because you specify that f is bounded and non-negative, which would seem to be redundant.)

Pick any partition. What are the Riemann sums for this partition? (This is trivial to work out, assuming I understand correctly that f(x)=0 for all x in [a,b]).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top