Proving Singular (2x2) Matrix Can Be Written in 2 Forms

  • Thread starter Thread starter vilhelm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
vilhelm
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have to proove that a singular (2 x 2)-matrix can be written as

a b
ta tb

or

ta tb
a b

My attempt is not a real proof, and as I'm very inexperienced with writing proofs, maybe someone could write it, so that I will understand it in the future.

Attempt.

Let B =
a b
c d

From the definition, det(B)= ad-bc.

For a singular matrix, det(B) = 0.

Hence ad-bc=0 <=> ad=bc <=> a/c=b/d.

We have that one row is a multiple of the other.

If A=
a b
ta tb
then we have a/ta=b/tb <=> 1/t=1/t, and that's true for all real t > 0.

And if
A =
ta tb
a b
Then we have ta/a=tb/b <=> t=t,
which is true for all t,a,c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The final portion of your proof is backwards.

Your are saying that if A= \begin{bmatrix}a &amp; b \\at &amp; bt\end{bmatrix} then |A|= 0.

What you want to prove is the other way: if |A|= 0 then A= \begin{bmatrix}a &amp; b \\at &amp; bt\end{bmatrix}.

You are correct that if ad- bc= 0, then a/c= b/d. Let t= a/c= b/d.
 
How about assuming the matrix is on the form:
\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> a &amp; b \\<br /> ta &amp; tb\end{array}\right)<br />
Then the determinant is:
atb - tab = 0,\forall t,a,b\in\mathbb{R}
q.e.d. Can you work the other one out then?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top