Proving X & Y Cannot Be Further From 1 Than Each Other

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimbo007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that for two probabilities p0 and p1, the ratio X = p1/p0 cannot be further from 1 than Y = p1(1-p0)/(p0(1-p1)). The user approaches the problem by analyzing three cases based on the relationship between p0 and p1. They express uncertainty about their reasoning, particularly regarding the implications of inequalities and the behavior of probabilities. Clarifications are provided on how to handle inequalities when multiplying by negative numbers and the necessity of showing that X < Y or X > Y based on the cases. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the relationships between X, Y, and their proximity to 1.
jimbo007
Messages
41
Reaction score
2
hi
i am trying to show that for 2 probabilities p_{0} and p_{1} that X=\frac{p_{1}}{p_{0}} cannot be further from 1 than Y=\frac{p_{1}(1-p_{0})}{p_{0}(1-p_{1})}

how i went about the problem was as follows:
i split it into 3 cases, case 1 is where p_{0}=p_{1}, case 2 is where p_{0}&gt;p_{1}, and case 3 is p_{0}&lt;p_{1}

for case 1 we have X=Y=1 so X is not further from 1 than Y

for case 2 we require that \frac{1-p_{0}}{1-p_{1}}&lt;1 for Y to be less than X
this is true if 1-p_{0}&lt;1-p_{1}
<=> p_{0}&gt;p_{1}
which is what we were assuming in first place

case 3 is a similar argument but with the inequality sign changed from less than to greater than.

i don't think the reasoning is that great, for example can i assume that multiplying a number by another number that isless than 1 but greater than 0 will result in a number smaller than the original. also unsure about the implications in case 2.

i need to be shown how to improve the reasoning as I'm not satisfied with the current way it is but i can't think of any way to improve it.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A note on the way you expressed this: you said "X cannot be further from 1 than Y" and I at first interpreted this to mean |1-X|< Y. But you clearly mean |1-X|< |1-Y|.

In tiny steps- If p0> p1 then p0/p1= X > 1 so |1-X|= X-1. Also, in this case, -p0> -p1 so 1-p0> 1-p1 and, finally, (1-p0)/(1-p1)> 0. Then
Y> X> 1 so |1-Y|= Y-1. You need to show X-1< Y-1 or X< Y (which we said above).
If p0 < p1 then the inequalities work the other way: Y< X< 1 so |1-X|= 1-X and |1-Y|= 1-Y. Now you need to show 1-X< 1-Y or X>Y (again, we just said that).

By the way, since probabilites CAN be equal to 0 or 1 you should state explicitely that your inequality does not work in those cases.
 
thanks for the reply!
i'm not sure i completely understand. for starters i can't see how you can say that -p0> -p1 and p0>p1. doesn't mutliplying by a negative change the inequality. and in your tiny step guide i see it boils down to showing whether X<Y, which was the the part i wasnt sure how to do.
case 2 for example (p0>p1):
do i show X<Y by first saying (along with inlcuding your "tiny steps") that we require
\frac{1-p_{0}}{1-p_{1}}&lt;1 (*)
(*) is true iff 1-p_{0}&lt;1-p_{1}
iff p_{0}&gt;p_{1} (**)
but we know (**) by assumption so (*) must also be true hence X<Y?

i think there were some subtleness in your proof but it kind of went *whoosh* straight over my head
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top