PSpice simulation vs temperature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on defining the sensitivity of piezoresistance as a function of temperature using PSpice simulation software. The user is experiencing issues with the "temp" variable not changing during a Temperature Sweep, suggesting a potential oversight in defining limits for the sweep. Piezoresistance, which is resistance that varies with stress, is highlighted as relevant in IC-based pressure sensors. A suggestion is made to create a thermistor model to effectively simulate temperature changes in the analysis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the simulation parameters for accurate results.
margyoala
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to define the sensitivity of a piezoresistance as a function of temperature using PARAMETERS. The equation is: {S=S0(1-TCS(temp-25))}.
The problem is that "temp" doesn't change during a Temperature Sweep, but I don't have any error either. Could you help me?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
last time I used spice (some time ago) i was supposed to define the limits for the temperature sweep in some file. maybe that's what's missing...
 
execusme, I will not answer you but I have a qustion


...what is the piezoresistance
 
Can anyone tell me how to use pspice simulation software for temperature analysis for resistor.
 
Piezoresistance is resistance that changes with stress. It's commonly used in IC based pressure sensors.

For the formula, I don't know of a direct call to pull up "temp" during a sim, but you can build a thermistor or temperature sensor model and use it. The extended call for a resistor is:

Rxxx Node1 Node2 Value TC=?

To make yourself a thermistor,
.subckt THERMISTOR TH1 TH2
R1 TH1 TH2 1K TC=.02
.ends THERMISTOR

Best of luck,

- Mike
 
Last edited:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top