Puzzled by an equation for relativistic time difference....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time difference for a light wave reaching two points, A' and C', in a relativistic framework. The problem involves a light flash emitted from point B' in frame S', which moves at speed v relative to frame S. The correct time difference is derived as Δt = Lp (2v / (c² - v²)), where Lp is the proper length between A' and B', and c is the speed of light. The initial assumption of simultaneous events in S' was incorrect, highlighting the necessity of applying the Lorentz transformation correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of proper length (Lp)
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Basic grasp of relativistic time dilation and simultaneity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore the implications of simultaneity in different inertial frames
  • Learn about the relationship between proper length and length contraction
  • Investigate the effects of relativistic speeds on electromagnetic wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, educators teaching relativity concepts, and anyone interested in the implications of relativistic effects on time and space.

ElPimiento
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that A', B', and C' are at rest in frame S', which moves with respect to S at speed v in the +x direction. Let B' be located exactly midway between A' and C'. At t' = 0, a light flash occurs at B' and expands outward as a spherical wave. (A', B', and C' are all on the +x axis, with A' having the smallest x coordinate and C' having the largest x coordinate. Assume A'B' = B'C' = Lp.)

What is the difference between the time it takes the wave front to reach A' and the time it takes to reach B' (Use the following as necessary: v, c and Lp.

Homework Equations


$$ \begin{align}
L & = \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma} \\
\Delta t & = \gamma \big( t' + \frac{v}{c^2}x' \big) \\
\end{align} $$

The Attempt at a Solution


I think an observer in S' would see the events simultaneously. So the time interval should be 0. but this is not the correct answer. So I will present an alternate attempt at rationalizing the situation.

An observer in S sees the light travel a distance AB = BC which is contracted from the proper length A'B' = B'C' according to:

$$ \text{AB} = \text{BC} = \frac{\text{A'B'}}{\gamma} = \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma} $$
Since the wave is an electromagnetic one, the time take to traverse these distances will be

$$ \Delta t_\text{AB} = \Bigg( \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma} \Bigg) \Bigg(\frac{1}{c + v} \Bigg) = \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma (c + v)} \\
\Delta t_\text{BC} = \Bigg( \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma} \Bigg) \Bigg(\frac{1}{c - v} \Bigg) = \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma (c - v)} \\
\implies \Delta t = \Delta t_\text{AB} - \Delta t_\text{BC} = \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma}\Bigg(\frac{2v}{c^2 - v^2} \Bigg)
$$

Now, I think the time interval being asked for is one from S' (which would not be the proper time right?). So I'll apply the inverted Lorentz transformation:

$$ \begin{align}
\Delta t' & = \gamma \big(\Delta t + \frac{v}{c^2} \Delta x \big) \\
& = \gamma \Bigg(\Delta t + \frac{v}{c^2} v \Delta t \Bigg) \\
& = \gamma \Delta t \Bigg( 1 + \frac{v^2}{c^2} \Bigg) \\
& = \gamma \frac{L_\text{p}}{\gamma}\Bigg(\frac{2v}{c^2 - v^2} \Bigg) \Bigg( 1 + \frac{v^2}{c^2} \Bigg) \\
& = L_\text{p} \Bigg(\frac{2v}{c^2 - v^2} \Bigg) \Bigg( 1 + \frac{v^2}{c^2} \Bigg)
\end{align}$$

But this is incorrect. The correct answer is:

$$ \Delta t = L_\text{p} \Bigg(\frac{2v}{c^2 - v^2} \Bigg) $$

Which I would get numerically by treating ##\Delta x ##, above, as 0; but I feel like this doesn't make physical sense since the ##\Delta x ## is distance B travels in the time between wavefronts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please provide the exact problem statement?
 
upload_2017-2-23_16-11-49.png


There you go.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K