[QM] Expectation value in spin-1/2 state

Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Basically I need to produce a state for a spin-1/2 particle such that the expectation value of <Jz> = 0 where <Jz> is for a spin-1 particle.

Homework Equations



Jz = (1 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 -1) <--[3x3] matrix

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't quite understand how to do this because up till now we have been trying to find expectation values for observables in same spin states.

Anyways here's my attempt:

ψ* Jz ψ = <Jz>
= ψ* (1 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 -1) ψ

the reason I get no further than this is because I don't see how I'm supposed to find a spin-1/2 state which would be in the form of a [2x1] matrix and then multiply the [3x3] matrix by a [2x1] matrix, what's the deal here? I'm guessing I've completely misinterpreted something but I can't see what. .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
can you be more precise with your question.
going from spin-1 to spin-1/2 doesn't really make sense, can you give us more context
on what your trying to do.
 
The exact question is as follows:
Produce a state of spin 1/2 particle such that when measuring <Jz> = 0, normalise that state. Can it be that at the same time <Jz> = 0 and <Jx> = 0?

It doesn't explicitly tell me that <Jz> is for a spin-one particle but I've just assumed that the J matrices are since that's what our lecturer has used as notation for spin-one particles and S for spin 1/2 particles. Hope this makes the question clearer?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top