QM: Operator in momentum representation

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys

As we have discussed earlier, we can represent some operator in an arbitrary basis by the use of the 1-operator:

<br /> T = \hat{1} T \hat{1} = \sum\limits_{\sigma_a,\sigma_b } {\left| {\psi _{\sigma_a} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right\rangle T_{\sigma_a\sigma_b \right\rangle \left\langle {\psi_{\sigma_b} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right|}<br />

However, in my book they represent the kinetic energy operator in momentum space by the following (disregarding spin)

<br /> \left\langle {{\bf{k}}&#039;} \right|T\left| {\bf{k}} \right\rangle \propto k^2 \delta _{{\bf{k}},{\bf{k}}&#039;}.<br />

I cannot seem to connect these two methods of representing operators in some basis. How can one realize that the book's way of transforming is the same as ours with 1-operators?Niles.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression

<br /> \left\langle {{\bf{k}}&#039;} \right|T\left| {\bf{k}} \right\rangle \propto k^2 \delta _{{\bf{k}},{\bf{k}}&#039;}<br />

is for the matrix elements of T. The corresponding operator could be written as

\hat{T} = \sum_k c k^2 |k\rangle\langle k|,

where c is the proportionality constant (probably 1/(2m)).
 
fzero said:
The expression

<br /> \left\langle {{\bf{k}}&#039;} \right|T\left| {\bf{k}} \right\rangle \propto k^2 \delta _{{\bf{k}},{\bf{k}}&#039;}<br />

is for the matrix elements of T. The corresponding operator could be written as

\hat{T} = \sum_k c k^2 |k\rangle\langle k|,

where c is the proportionality constant (probably 1/(2m)).

Thanks, but how do we know what I have highlighted above? I can see that you have inserted the 1-operator.
 
All I did was substitute the matrix elements into the corresponding version of the equation <br /> <br /> T = \sum\limits_{\sigma_a,\sigma_b } {\left| {\psi _{\sigma_a} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right\rangle T_{\sigma_a\sigma_b \right\rangle \left\langle {\psi_{\sigma_b} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right|}<br /> <br />
 
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top