QM: position and spin dependent potential

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spin 1/2 particle of mass m is described by the Hamiltonian: H = p^2/(2m) + 1/2 mw^2 x^2 + g * x * sigma_x, where sigma_x is one of the Pauli matrices.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to start. It's obvious that the harmonic oscillator part of H should be multiplied by unit matrix. Does this mean that I need to diagonalize the whole matrix H? That would give me two eigenvalues containing operators p and x. When I solve the two equations, I should get the energies for spin up and spin down? I'm not certain is it ok to mix the spin and position variables in such a way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the wavefunction as a two-component vector

\begin{pmatrix} \psi_+(x) \\ \psi_-(x) \end{pmatrix}.
 
Yes, that's exactly what I did and it leads to the following equations:
(\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_+)\Psi_+ + gx\Psi_-=0 \qquad<br /> (\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_-)\Psi_- + gx\Psi_+=0

Now, for this system to be consistent, it's necessary for the determinant to vanish. But here the coefficients are not numbers but operators! I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to calculate the determinant of an operator?
 
Heirot said:
Yes, that's exactly what I did and it leads to the following equations:
(\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_+)\Psi_+ + gx\Psi_-=0 \qquad<br /> (\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_-)\Psi_- + gx\Psi_+=0

Now, for this system to be consistent, it's necessary for the determinant to vanish. But here the coefficients are not numbers but operators! I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to calculate the determinant of an operator?

You still want to solve

H \psi = E \psi,

so don't introduce E_\pm at this point. I was a bit hasty to introduce \psi_\pm. Things will be cleaner if you use (\Psi_1, \Psi_2), since we're not working in the basis that diagonalizes \sigma_x. All together, we'll have

(\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E)\Psi_1 + gx\Psi_2=0 \qquad<br /> (\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E)\Psi_2 + gx\Psi_1=0.

Don't worry about any determinants yet, just consider the sum and difference of these equations and find the spectrum. The determinant of those equations is zero whenever E=E_\pm, the energy eigenvalues, so it's consistent.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top