Quantum harmonic oscillator, uncertainty relation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the quantum harmonic oscillator, specifically the relationship between position and momentum operators expressed through annihilation and creation operators. The participant grapples with calculating expectation values and the uncertainty relation, initially arriving at an incorrect conclusion that the uncertainty is zero. Clarification is provided regarding the correct application of the eigenvalue equation in bra notation and the use of commutation relations to derive expectation values. Ultimately, the correct expectation values are confirmed, leading to a proper understanding of the uncertainty relation in the context of coherent states.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a particle with mass m oscillates in a simple harmonic potential with frequency ω. The position, x, and momentum operator, p, of the particle can be expressed in terms of the annihilation and creation operator (a and a respectively):
x = (ħ/2mω)^0.5 * (a + a)
p = i(ħmω/2)^0.5 * (a - a)
The annihilation and creation operators satisfy the following commutation relations:
[a,a] = 1
The eigenvalue equation of a is found as:
a|α> = α|α>
Where |α> is a coherent state
a) Find the expectation value <a> in coherent state |α>
b) Find the expectation values of <aa>, <aa>, and <aa>
c) Calculate the uncertainty relation (<(x-<x>)2><(p-<p>)2>)0.5

Homework Equations


Relevant equations given above

The Attempt at a Solution


I've worked through most of the problem and only noticed that I may have done something wrong when I got to part c, where the expression that I get for <x> causes the expectation value <(x-<x>)2> to be equal to 0, which also means the uncertainty relation is equal to 0. I think the error may be when I wrote the eigenvalue equation for a in bra notation like this:
<α|a = <α|α*
Is this the correct way of expressing the eigenvalue equation given in the question in bra notation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys-student said:
<α|a† = <α|α*
Is this the correct way of expressing the eigenvalue equation given in the question in bra notation?
That's correct. But I don't know where you went wrong unless you provide your calculation.
 
If that is correct then the expectation values are as follows; <a>=α*, <a> = α, <aa> = α2, <aa> = α*2, and <aa> = <aa> = αα*.

This means that the expectation value <x> is: <x> = (ħ/2mω)0.5(<a> + <a>) = (ħ/2mω)0.5(α* + α)

So the expression (x-<x>)2 = x2 - 2x(ħ/2mω)0.5(α* + α) + (ħ/2mω)(α* + α)2

So the expectation value from the uncertainty relation is: <(x-<x>)2> = <x2> - 2*(ħ/2mω)0.5(α*+α)<x> + (ħ/2mω)(α* + α)2

The expectation value <x2> is:
<x2> = (ħ/2mω)(<aa> + <aa> + <aa> + <aa>) = (ħ/2mω)(α* + α)2

If you sub the expression for <x> and <x2> back into the expression for <(x-<x>)2> it ends up reducing to 0
 
phys-student said:
<aa†> = <a†a> = αα*.
That's where you go wrong. Your ##\langle a^\dagger a \rangle## is correct, but your ##\langle aa^\dagger \rangle## is not. To calculate the latter, you could have used the commutation between the annihilation and raising operators and ##\langle a^\dagger a \rangle##.
 
Okay so you are saying that <aa> = αα* is correct, then using the commutation relation:

[a,a] = aa - aa = 1, therefore: aa = 1 + aa

So then the expectation value of aa is: <aa> = 1 + <aa> = 1 + αα*

Is that correct?
 
phys-student said:
Is that correct?
Yes.
 
Okay thanks
 
Back
Top