Quantum Measurements of L2 in a Wave Function: Calculations and Probabilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter nmsurobert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    observables
nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


A particle is in a state described by a wave function of the form ψ(r) = (x+y+z)f(r).
What are the values that a measurement of L2 can yield? What is probability for all these results?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I feel this problem shouldn't be too hard but I've been struggling with quantum since last semester so any guidance would be nice. I think i should probably write the function in spherical terms to start off with. but I'm not too clear on where to go from there. I also know that i need to use Ylm too but again, I'm pretty confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will be helpful to use the spherical harmonics written in Cartesian coordinates. Your task is to find ##Y_{lm}##'s in which the given ##\psi(\mathbf{r})## is expanded, $$\psi(\mathbf{r}) = f(r)\sum_{lm} c_{lm} Y_{lm}(\hat{r})$$
 
ok ill try to do some work with that. I'm still pretty lost on what the whole Ylm thing is about but hopefully i can make some sense of it.
 
I don't know what book you're studying out of, but most go through the steps to show that L2Ψ=ħ2l(l+1)Ψ That might help make the problem a bit easier.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top