Quantum Mechanics: Particle in a Box Periodic BC's

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


The question says to solve the Schrodinger equation for a particle in a box with periodic conditions and then it gives.
ψ(0)=ψ(a)

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the above BC and I also did it as its derivative. (It wasn't stated but I assumed it was implied. I had no other way to solve for anything.)

Here is my work..
http://imageshack.us/a/img853/9774/qmproblem2.jpg

I was able to get the Energies, but I now have nothing left to solve for A and B! I was thinking of setting ψ(0)=0 or ψ(a)=0 but I don't know if this is correct because it is the same as the non-periodic condition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
A box is bended so that point x=0 and point x=a coincide. derivatives and value of wave function coincide there. That might be an interpretation for your question.
 
The norm of the wave function must be 1. This is the missing condition.
 
I did the normalization and came to the following...
A=\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}-B^2}

I still need one more condition to solve for A and B...
 
You have two unknowns, A and B. You have two equations relating them with each other and a. I do not think you need anything else.
 
There are three unknowns: A, B, and k. You might find it easier to understand if you write the solution in the form ##\psi(x) = A \cos(kx+\phi)##. The normalization condition will allow you to solve for A, and like before, periodicity allows you to solve for k.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top