Quantum - Projection Probability - Projection amplitudes for SHO states.

metgt4
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Quantum - Projection Probability - "Projection amplitudes for SHO states."

Given the two normalized 2D SHO wave functions <x,y|mx[/SUB ],ny> for the second energy level n = nx + ny = 1 in the mx[/SUB ],ny representation:

<x,y|1,0> = (2/pi)1/2xexp[-(x2+y2)/2]
<x,y|0,1> = (2/pi)1/2yexp[-(x2+y2)/2]

and in the alternative n, m representation <x,y|n,m>

<x,y|1,+1> = (1/pi)1/2(x+iy)exp[-(x2+y2)/2]

<x,y|1,-1> = (1/pi)1/2(x-iy)exp[-(x2+y2)/2]

(a) Construct a table of projection amplitudes between these two similar to Table 7-1 (I'll include this table in the attachments) for photon polarization states.

The question continues, but I would like to work the rest out myself. I just don't seem to understand how to change from one base to the other for this question!Thanks for any hints or help you can give me!

Andrew
 

Attachments

  • scan0002.jpg
    scan0002.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 500
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Am I at all on the right track here? I have a relation between the two bases, but this is as far as I've gotten all week! What I've got is attached.

Thanks!
Andrew
 

Attachments

  • scan0003.jpg
    scan0003.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 451
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top