Quark mixing factor in CKM matrix

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
I find that the quark mixing factor say for example ##V_{ub}## is the same for:
u ##\Leftrightarrow## b
##u\Leftrightarrow\bar{b}##
##\bar{u}\Leftrightarrow## b
##\bar{u}\Leftrightarrow\bar{b}##
Does this have something to do with weak interaction being unable to distinguish these from one another?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no (known) interaction which turns a quark into an anti-quark as that would violate baryon number.

For the coupling between ##u## and ##b## being equal (in magnitude) to the coupling between ##\bar u## and ##\bar b##, this is a simple consequence of the Lagrangian density being Hermitian.
 
Orodruin said:
There is no (known) interaction which turns a quark into an anti-quark as that would violate baryon number.

For the coupling between ##u## and ##b## being equal (in magnitude) to the coupling between ##\bar u## and ##\bar b##, this is a simple consequence of the Lagrangian density being Hermitian.
I can understand that the coupling between u and b is equal (in magnitude) to the coupling between ##\bar{u}## and ##\bar{b}## due to the Hermitian property but in the decay of charged Kaon,
##K^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ + \nu_\mu##
the hadronic part of the current has ##V_{c\bar{s}}## which is the same coupling as ##V_{cs}##.
 
Last edited:
It is not a transition between them, that is the point.
You can rotate the diagram to get u -> s+W+, for example (no c involved in a kaon decay). The vertex stays the same, so you need Vus.
 
Sorry ##V_{us}##. Ah, now I get it. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K