Question about Damped Simple Harmonic Oscillation ?

Abir Sarkar
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Question about Damped Simple Harmonic Oscillation !?

Under appreciable damping , Why amplitude resonance and Velocity resonance occurs at slightly different frequencies ?

- Abir Sarkar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Abir Sarkar said:
Under appreciable damping , Why amplitude resonance and Velocity resonance occurs at slightly different frequencies ?

- Abir Sarkar

Say we have a damped system driven at some frequency. The amplitude will be some smooth function of frequency. At max amplitude the slope of the function will be zero. Increase the function slightly, the amplitude does not change (much) but because the frequency is greater the velocity will be greater. The maximum will occur at different frequencies.

Does that seem to make sense? %^)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top