Question about Galileo's principle of relativity

vmtgomes
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, this is my first post. I'm not sure if it is supposed to be in this section.

But, if Galileo's principle of relativity says we can't do any experiments which would tell whether we are moving or stationary, why can't we say, for example, that if a vehicle with constant velocity relative to Earth is in fact moving as we notice that there is no fuel available after some time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because you could equally argue that the car is stationary and the Earth was moving and that since friction between the Earth and car would tend to drag the car with the Earth, the car must use up fuel in order to overcome this friction and "stay in place".

All the car burning fuel tells us is that there is a velocity difference between car and Earth, it tells us nothing about the absolute velocity of either.
 
Oh, I see!

Thank you.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top