Question about shear flow / stress

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about shear flow and stress, participants clarify that when calculating QB, the full area of the connected part should be used rather than just the red part. Using the center board simplifies the calculation by providing a single shear plane, avoiding the need to divide by two, which is necessary when using side boards. The dimensions of the boards play a crucial role, as using side boards can lead to incorrect results if they differ in size. The complexity increases in part b due to the direction of shear flow, requiring careful consideration of the area between nailed joints and the centroid's vertical distance to the neutral axis. Overall, understanding the geometry and shear planes is essential for accurate calculations in shear flow problems.
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For QB , why shouldn't the QB = red part only ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is there anything wrong with the solution given ?
Since When we 'cut ' the boards , the b is the red part which in contact with the other board , right ? [/B]
 

Attachments

  • 511.PNG
    511.PNG
    68.6 KB · Views: 422
  • 512.PNG
    512.PNG
    23.1 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:

Homework Statement


For QB , why shouldn't the QB = red part only ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is there anything wrong with the solution given ?
Since When we 'cut ' the boards , the b is the red part which in contact with the other board , right ? [/B]
Nothing wrong with solution. Remember when determining bolt shear, use the full area of connected part when determining Q.
 
Sorry to bump this but when finding QB why can we not use one of the boards on the left or right? Why the center board?
 
Raeksis said:
Sorry to bump this but when finding QB why can we not use one of the boards on the left or right? Why the center board?
You can do it that way and get the same result without having to divide by 2 when you use the center board, because now there is just one shear plane instead of 2 when using the first method.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can do it that way and get the same result without having to divide by 2 when you use the center board, because now there is just one shear plane instead of 2 when using the first method.
But I was thinking that only works here because the boards are the same dimensions.

In a question like this below (b), if I use one of the side boards I get a different (wrong) answer than if I use the center board.

main-qimg-28763a636910916c63557f31d77183d8?convert_to_webp=true.png
 
Raeksis said:
But I was thinking that only works here because the boards are the same dimensions.

In a question like this below (b), if I use one of the side boards I get a different (wrong) answer than if I use the center board.

View attachment 196206
Part b is a bit more tricky than part a because in part b, the longitudinal shear flow across the nail is into the plane of the page (z direction) on the yz side face of a cubic element, in contrast to part a where the longitudinal shear flow across the nail is into the plane of the page (z direction) on the xz top face of a cubic element. Consequently, in part b, the shear flow is horizontally distributed across the top board, so you need to find Q based on the area of the board in between the nailed joints, and the vertical distance from its centroid to the neutral axis. Then divide result by 2 when determining shear flow, because there are 2 shear planes.
Alternatively, you could use the Q of the area outside of the top cuts, but when so doing, you must use the full area , that is, the area of both vertical pieces times the vertical distance of its centroid to the neutral axis. This a more tedious way of finding it.
Part b is a stronger connection than part a, because the Q in part b is less.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top