Question about the Derivation of the Equations of Vibration

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amadeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Vibration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the equations of undamped free vibrations, specifically the differential equation mu'' + ku = 0, where m is the mass and k is the spring constant. The solution is expressed as u = Acos(ωt) + Bsin(ωt), with ω defined as √(k/m). The transformation of this solution into the form u = Rcos(ωt - Φ) is explained through the relationships between the constants A, B, R, and Φ, where A and B represent initial displacement and velocity, respectively. The discussion emphasizes that A and B can be any constants, and their selection determines the initial conditions of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with concepts of harmonic motion and oscillations.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their applications in physics.
  • Basic understanding of polar and Cartesian coordinate systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the general solution for second-order linear differential equations.
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of harmonic oscillators in mechanical systems.
  • Explore the relationship between initial conditions and the constants in differential equations.
  • Investigate the use of polar coordinates in solving problems related to oscillations and vibrations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics who are studying oscillatory systems and their mathematical representations.

Amadeo
Messages
28
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Derivation of Equation of Vibration
For undamped free vibrations, we have the following differential equation.

mu'' + ku = 0

where m is the mass of the object hanging on the end of a spring, and u is the distance from the equilibrium position as a function of time.

This yields u = Acosωt + Bsinωt

where ω is √(k/m) (k=spring constant).

I am having trouble understanding why this can be rewritten as

u = RcosΦcosωt + RsinΦsinωt (which, in turn, = Rcos(ωt -Φ) )

If A represents the initial displacement from equilibrium (ui), I can see how we could set this equal to RcosΦ, (R being the maximum displacement) thereby defining Φ to be that value which makes ui=RcosΦ true. But, I don't see why B must, in that case, necessarily be RsinΦ.

It looks like B must be the initial velocity (vi) multiplied by m/k.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This just occurred to me:

Since the solution u = Acosωt + Bsinωt is general, A and B can be any two constants. If we choose two arbitrary constants for A and B, this will determine the initial displacement and the initial velocity.

Alternatively, if we choose two arbitrary values for the initial displacement and velocity, these will determine A and B.

In this case, we are choosing values for A and B. These values then determine the initial velocity and displacement. We could choose any values we wish, but we chose these values (A= RcosΦ and B=RsinΦ) because they enable the convenient reformulation Rcos(ωt -Φ).

Any more insights would be appreciated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and PeroK
You mentioned a mass hanging from a spring and its displacement (m,k,u). The solution is Acosωt + Bsinωt where both A and B have displacement units. I understand those. The R and Φ look like polar coordinates, range and angle. Does your spring hang from a pivot? Describe exactly what is vibrating.
 
Last edited:
Amadeo said:
This just occurred to me:

Since the solution u = Acosωt + Bsinωt is general, A and B can be any two constants. If we choose two arbitrary constants for A and B, this will determine the initial displacement and the initial velocity.

Alternatively, if we choose two arbitrary values for the initial displacement and velocity, these will determine A and B.

In this case, we are choosing values for A and B. These values then determine the initial velocity and displacement. We could choose any values we wish, but we chose these values (A= RcosΦ and B=RsinΦ) because they enable the convenient reformulation Rcos(ωt -Φ).

Any more insights would be appreciated.

Another way to look at it: the set ##(A, B)## is just the set of any two numbers. You could think of this as points in a plane expressed in Cartesian coordinates. Equally, you could express this in polar coordinates ##(R\cos \phi, R \sin \phi)##, where ##R^2 = A^2 + B^2## etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K