Question about the Dirac Delta Function

xoxomae
Messages
23
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the Fourier spectrum of the following equation

Homework Equations


##F(\omega)=\pi[\delta(\omega - \omega _0)+\delta(\omega +\omega_0)]##

The Attempt at a Solution


Would the Fourier spectrum just be two spikes at ##+\omega _0## and ##-\omega _0## which go up to infinity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. My guess is you are supposed to find the function that has such a Fourier transform ?
When you carry out the integration to find that functionl the ##\delta## functions will behave decently -- check the definition of a delta function
 
xoxmae already has a function ##F\left( \omega\right)## that has two "spikes", one at ##\omega = \omega_0## and one at ##\omega = -\omega_0##. The Fourier transform of this will not have spikes.
 
George Jones said:
xoxmae already has a function ##F\left( \omega\right)## that has two "spikes", one at ##\omega = \omega_0## and one at ##\omega = -\omega_0##. The Fourier transform of this will not have spikes.
He didn't ask for the Fourier transform of F(ω). He asked for the spectrum, i.e. a graph in the frequency domain, which is what BvU said, except it's not sufficient to say " ... spikes which go up to to infinity ..." of course. What of the ω coefficient?

I also agree with BvU that the problem was more likely to find the inverse transform of F(ω).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top