Question about the jones matrix for a quarter wave plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the optical filter represented by a Jones matrix for a quarter wave plate. The user applies a rotation matrix to transform the given matrix and questions the significance of the term e^{i\pi/2}. They deduce that this term simplifies to i, leading to a matrix that resembles a half wave plate with an additional phase factor. The conclusion suggests that the matrix could represent a half wave plate with its fast axis oriented at a 45-degree angle to the horizontal. The analysis highlights the relationship between the matrix components and their implications for optical properties.
richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I need to identify the optical filter with jones matrix

A=\frac{1}{sqrt{2}}e^{-i\pi /4}\left[\begin{matrix}1&-i \\ -i&1 \end{matrix}\right]

Homework Equations



See attempt

The Attempt at a Solution



So I have applied the rotation matrix like this : RAR^{-1}R(\theta)=\left[\begin{matrix}\cos\theta&-\sin\theta \\ \sin\theta&\cos\theta \end{matrix}\right]I wind up with R(\pi /4)AR^{-1}(\pi /4)=e^{i\pi /2}\left[\begin{matrix}1&0 \\ 0&-1 \end{matrix}\right]Now my problem is what does the e^{i\pi /2} mean? what makes it different from a quarter wave plate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
not sure, but from Euler's formula which is exp(i*alpha)=cos(alpha)+i*sin(alpha) I know that exp(i*pi/2)=cos(pi/2)+i*sin(pi/2)=i. Then substituting i instead of exp(i*pi/2) in your last formula I ended up with matrix {{i,0},{0,-i}}
Your matrix looks like a half wave plate with extra term of exp(i*pi/2). It might be also a HWP with fast axis at pi/4 angle w.r.t. horizontal axis: {{cos 2*pi/4, sin 2*pi/4},{sin 2*pi/4, -cos 2*pi/4}}={{i,0},{0,-i}}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top