Question-Electrostatics-Point charge and uncharged plate

AI Thread Summary
A point charge placed near a large uncharged metal plate induces negative charge on the side facing the charge and positive charge on the opposite side. The electric field inside the slab is zero, leading to the conclusion that the point charge does not experience any force. However, the discussion highlights that the force is considered non-zero, which is a contradiction. This situation is clarified by referencing the "method of images," a technique used to solve problems involving conductors and point charges. Understanding this method is crucial for accurately calculating the force in such electrostatic scenarios.
GPhab
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge is placed at a distance "d" from a huge uncharged metal (slab or plate).[Comment: I'm not sure. Work out both cases]. Calculate the force with which the charge attracts the plate.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The field inside the slab is zero. Imagine a plate and a point charge (say +Q) is placed to its right. A negative charge appears on the side facing the charge and positive charge on other side. Calculating the charge density is not a problem. As the field due to plates of charge doesn't vary with distance(they are small compared to the dimensions in this case), there is no net field due to the positive and negative induced charge surfaces at the place where the point charge is. So the point charge won't experience any force. But we were told that the force IS NON-ZERO. For the plate case, the positive and negative induced charges are at the same place and the force is zero. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry. I found that this is a standard example demonstrating some technique called "method of images".
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top