Question from Haar's Problems in QM.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372

Homework Statement


Determine the momentum proobability distribution function for particles in the n-th energy state in a potential well.

Homework Equations


a is the width of the well.
The answer is:for n odd:|a(p)|^2 = \frac{4an^2\pi}{\hbar}\frac{1}{(\frac{a^2p^2}{\hbar^2}-\pi^2n^2)^2} cos^2(\frac{pa}{2\hbar})
for n even:
:|a(p)|^2 = \frac{4an^2\pi}{\hbar}\frac{1}{(\frac{a^2p^2}{\hbar^2}-\pi^2n^2)^2} sin^2(\frac{pa}{2\hbar})


The Attempt at a Solution


What equations should I use here?

Sorry for my misunderstanding, it's more than a year from QM1, and I am bit rusty, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a couple of options:

(1)Solve Schroedinger's equation in the momentum basis to find (a normalized) \psi(p) (your problem statement seem to call this a(p))...Since your potential is given in the position basis, you would need to first take its Fourier Transform to find its momentum basis representation.

(2)Solve Schroedinger's equation in the position basis to find (a normalized) \psi(x) and then compute its Fourier transform to find \psi(p)

(3)If you have already solved Shroedinger's equation in either basis in your text/notes, just quote that solution and take the Fourier transform if necessary.

Once you've found \psi(p), the momentum probability distribution is just its modulus squared.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top