Question on Motion of a car round a banked track

  • Thread starter Thread starter Freyth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Motion Track
AI Thread Summary
A racing car weighing 1000kg moves at a constant speed of 108km/h around a banked track with a horizontal radius of 100m. The angle of inclination of the track can be calculated using the formula tan(theta) = v^2 / rg, resulting in an angle of approximately 42 degrees. The reaction force at the wheels is calculated to be 13450N. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces acting on the car, including the need for a free body diagram to analyze vertical and horizontal forces. The conversion of speed from km/h to m/s is also highlighted as a crucial step in solving the problem.
Freyth
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Question on Motion of a car round a banked track [SOLVED]

Homework Statement



A racing car of 1000kg moves round a banked track at a constant speed of 108km/h. Assuming the total reaction at the wheel is normal to the track, and the horizontal radius is 100m, calculate the angle of inclination of the track to the horizontal and the reaction at the wheels.

Homework Equations



tan(theta) = v^2 / rg where r is the radius and g is 10m/s

v = rw, w is the angular speed, r is the radius

F = mrw^2 = mv^2 / r
, F is the force towards the centre of the track, r is the radius, w is the angular speed

The Attempt at a Solution



Currently in a Junior College, not sure what that equates to in any part of the world but it's sort of a Pre-University education. So that should give you some idea on my knowledge.

I tried drawing a vector diagram as attached. But I can't figure out whether the car is at the extreme of the track so that its horizontal distance is 100m from the track.

However, I'm also unsure if the above equations with radius means horizontal radius. That said, I assumed it to be and I used the above equations to try solving but I couldn't get an answer. Spent over 2 hours and I'm stumped... Anyone care to help? Any help is appreciated!

P.S. the Answer is 42 degrees and 13450N.
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 969
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The 100m means that the radius of the centrifugal force is 100m. The fact that the reaction at the wheel is normal to the surface means that the frictional force along the track and the centrifugal force along the track are equal. This should give you the angle.
 
Draw the freebody diagram of the car... It is on an incline at an angle theta... what are the forces acting on it...

EDIT: nevermind... I'll have a look at the picture you've attached when it is approved...
 
The tan(theta) equation you have posted gives you the angle... can you show your calculations?
 
Okay guys, thanks for your input. I forgot that by converting 108km/h gives me 30m/s. I was under the impression that it was 108 x 1000 x 3600, when it should have been
(108 x 1000) / 3600 = 30m/s.

So by using tan (theta) = v^2 / rg,

(theta) = tan^-1 (900 / 100 x 10) = 41.9 ~ 42 degrees.

I've yet to find the reaction force but I'm sure I can handle that.

Thanks for the fast replies! Greatly appreciated.
 
Freyth said:
Okay guys, thanks for your input. I forgot that by converting 108km/h gives me 30m/s. I was under the impression that it was 108 x 1000 x 3600, when it should have been
(108 x 1000) / 3600 = 30m/s.

So by using tan (theta) = v^2 / rg,

(theta) = tan^-1 (900 / 100 x 10) = 41.9 ~ 42 degrees.

I've yet to find the reaction force but I'm sure I can handle that.

Thanks for the fast replies! Greatly appreciated.

Although the formula works... you should be able to derive the formula yourself... using the freebody diagram... what are the vertical forces? what are the horizontal forces? what is the vertical acceleration? what is the horizontal acceleration?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top