Question related to the Lorentz Invariance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Lorentz invariance as presented in Mark Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory," specifically problem 2.9(c). The user explores two methods to compute the exponential of the generator \( S^{12} \): one using Taylor expansion and the other using the original exponential form. The discrepancy between the results—0 from the Taylor expansion and 1 from the exponential form—stems from the proper handling of the matrix elements and the dimensionality of the argument in the exponential. The correct interpretation confirms that the result is indeed 0, aligning with the expected outcome.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations and invariance
  • Familiarity with matrix representations of generators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Taylor series and exponential functions in mathematical physics
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating 4x4 matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Learn about the role of generators in quantum mechanics, focusing on \( S^{12} \)
  • Explore Taylor series expansions and their applications in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the relationship between matrix exponentiation and physical transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory and special relativity, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Lorentz invariance and its mathematical foundations.

lhcQFT
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a question related to the Lorentz invariance.

(on the book of Mark Srednicki Quantum Field Theory, page 35 prob. 2.9 c)

There are representations of \Lambda and S.

In order to show that result of problem, I use number of two ways.

1. I expanded \Lambda to infinitesimal form using Taylor expansion.
2. Just original shape of exponential form.

When I inserted values of S^12, the first method gives me that the value is 0.(by specific element, that is rho = 0, tau =1) But the second method gives me that the value is 1.

The correct answer is 0. because most of components are 0 except for middle row and middle column(2x2). I can't understand this discrepancy. Please explain this error.

(Sorry about that I can't use Latex. because I'm a novice of this web site..)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you don't have to use infinitesimal expansions... Just use the series form for the exponential:

e^{A} = \sum_{n} \frac{A^{n}}{n!}

I use \hbar =1 although it doesn't matter to state since you can also rename S^{12} \equiv \frac{1}{\hbar} S^{12} and using the appropriate form for S^{12} repr, as I do below - no hbar, all to keep exponential argument dimensionless. Also some expressions might look terrible, but if you are accustomed to these calculations, you can jump them - i just did everything almost explicitly because I don't know you.

e^{-i \theta S^{12}} = \sum_{n} \frac{(-i \theta S^{12})^{n}}{n!}

e^{-i \theta S^{12}} = 1_{4 \times 4} + \sum_{p=1} (-i)^{2p} (S^{12})^{2p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p}+\sum_{p=0} (-i)^{2p+1} (S^{12})^{2p+1} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1}

Now [(S^{12})^{2}]^{\rho}_{\omega} = \sum_{\sigma} (S^{12})^{\rho}_{\sigma} (S^{12})^{\sigma}_{\omega} = \sum_{\sigma} (-i)^{2} (g^{1 \rho} \delta^{2}_{\sigma}- g^{2 \rho} \delta^{1}_{\sigma}) (g^{1 \sigma} \delta^{2}_{\omega}- g^{2 \sigma} \delta^{1}_{\omega})= - \sum_{\sigma}[ g^{1 \rho} \delta^{2}_{\sigma} g^{1 \sigma} \delta^{2}_{\omega} - g^{1 \rho} \delta^{2}_{\sigma}g^{2 \sigma} \delta^{1}_{\omega}- g^{2 \rho} \delta^{1}_{\sigma}g^{1 \sigma} \delta^{2}_{\omega}+ g^{2 \rho} \delta^{1}_{\sigma}g^{2 \sigma} \delta^{1}_{\omega}]

Now from this -due to summing over the delta kroenecker and metric is diagonal- the 1st and last term vanish, while the other two survive... So you have [doing the sum of sigma]:

[(S^{12})^{2}]^{\rho}_{\omega} = g^{1 \rho} g^{22} \delta^{1}_{\omega}+ g^{2 \rho} g^{11} \delta^{2}_{\omega}

From here you see that the squared S^{12} is diagonal (try putting \rho \ne \omega ) and has entries 1 at \rho = \omega = 1,2. I'll drop 12 of S since we are only caring about them, and with S I'll mean the matrix of S^{12}

S^{2} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{bmatrix}

So every power S^{2k} = S^{2},~ (k&gt;0). This can also be seen without doing any calculations if you could have noticed the similarity of S to the Pauli matrice in a block form. What about the S^{2k+1} ? Well you just have to multiply S^{2} with the S matrix...
<br /> S \cdot S^{2} = -i \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} =<br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -i &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; i &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} = S<br /> <br />

And finally you can find the exponential:

e^{-i \theta S} = 1_{4 \times 4} + S^{2} \sum_{p=1} (-i)^{2p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p}+ S \sum_{p=0} (-i)^{2p+1} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1}= 1_{4 \times 4} + S^{2} \sum_{p=1} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p}- i S \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1}

which in matrix form is:

e^{-i \theta S} =<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1+\sum_{p=1} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p} &amp; - \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1} &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1} &amp; 1+\sum_{p=1} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p} &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br />

That's the \Lambda you have... just see the series expansions of cos and sin in your expression...

e^{-i \theta S} =<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p} &amp; - \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1} &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p+1!})^{2p+1} &amp; \sum_{p=0} (-1)^{p} (\frac{\theta}{2p!})^{2p} &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br /> <br /> =<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; \cos \theta &amp; - \sin \theta &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; \sin \theta &amp; \cos \theta &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} <br /> <br />
 
Last edited:
Ah.. Thank you for your guide. I make sense how to calculate. :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K