Questions about Gravity and Acceleration of masses.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of gravity and acceleration, emphasizing that the acceleration of an object in free fall is independent of its mass, assuming negligible friction. However, when considering extremely massive objects, such as Jupiter, their own gravitational fields can influence the Earth's gravitational field, complicating the acceleration dynamics. The equation for gravitational force, F=GMm/r², illustrates that both masses affect each other, particularly when they are comparable in size. If a massive object like Jupiter were positioned near Earth, both would experience mutual acceleration towards each other, challenging the notion that acceleration due to gravity is solely dependent on the Earth's mass. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of gravitational interactions when large masses are involved.
mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
So as we all know the acceleration of an object is independent of it's mass (neglecting friction)...so if you dropped a rock and a car they should technically accelerate downward at the same rate. But what about if the object we were dropping was really massive, like so massive it would have its own gravitational field, wouldn't that field then affect the Earth's gravitational field and pull the Earth a bit towards it, and so this massive object wouldn't accelerate downward at the same rate as say a rock? Which would mean that acceleration due to gravity isn't actually completely independent of mass?
Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even small objects pull the Earth toward them.
You have to be careful to measure acceleration as change in distance from some fixed point - not as distance to the earth.
 
Well normally you will have g=GM/r2 where 'r' is the radius of the Earth and 'M' is the mass of the Earth (we are assuming you are dropping things from a small height above the Earth).

Now you see 'g' is independent of any other mass except for the Earth.

g=acceleration due to gravity = force exerted per unit mass on an object in a gravitational field = F/m = GMm/r2/m=GM/r2


If you are dropping another mass which is comparable to the mass of Earth (5.9742 × 1024 kg), then both masses would matter and so would the distance between them.

How you are dropping such a mass is another matter.
 
Right, I just used massive objects for a better example...but say you "dropped" Jupiter right above the earth, Jupiter has a much stronger gravitational field, so wouldn't Jupiter remain stationary and the Earth would accelerate towards it...so the acceleration of Jupiter would be zero as oppose to 9.8m/s^2? I realize this example is ridiculous but it's the best I could think of to get my point across.
 
mmmboh said:
Right, I just used massive objects for a better example...but say you "dropped" Jupiter right above the earth, Jupiter has a much stronger gravitational field, so wouldn't Jupiter remain stationary and the Earth would accelerate towards it...so the acceleration of Jupiter would be zero as oppose to 9.8m/s^2? I realize this example is ridiculous but it's the best I could think of to get my point across.

The force between them would be F=GMm/r2 where 'r' is the distance between the masses 'M' and 'm'. So essentially they'd both be under the same force by Newton's 3rd Law.
 
Hey Josh :)

If you "dropped" Jupiter at some point relative to the Earth, both would feel the same force F=\frac{GMm}{r^2}, where M is the mass of Jupiter and m the mass of Earth. If you imagine some arbitrary point between Jupiter and the Earth, Jupiter would accelerate towards it with a=\frac{Gm}{r^2} and the Earth would accelerate towards it with a=\frac{GM}{r^2}.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top