Stargazing Quick and Easy Telescope Measurments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Willis666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Telescope
AI Thread Summary
To measure celestial objects with a telescope for a science fair project, consider using the magnification of the lens to determine the field of view. Instead of directly using a ruler, projecting the image onto a white surface can provide a clearer way to measure dimensions. It's important to establish a repeatable procedure and recalibrate your setup frequently, especially if environmental conditions change. Suggestions include targeting distant terrestrial objects or known celestial features, such as craters on the Moon, to ensure accurate measurements. Consistency in your method will enhance the reliability of your results.
Willis666
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
For my science fair, I need to take measurments (to scale) on a telescope, for example, I need to be able to point it towards the moon, and measure its radius. Now, my problem there is how will I measure this? Since my eye will be in the way, I can't use a ruler to find a crude measurement, so I was wondering how I can do this. I don't want to spend much money on this, so I don't want to buy an adapter for my camera to attack to my telescope. Can I just shove my camera lense into the lense of the telesope viewfinder, and take a snapshot? I asked my stepdad, but he doesn't know much about telescopes (was more interested in microphysics.)

So do you guys have any idea how I can do this? The pictures wouldn't have to be nice.

I can't just eyeball it, since for the project I'll be looking at some pretty far off objects.

If I'm not being clear on something, feel free to ask.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The only way I can think of is to know the magnification of the particular lens you are using. That will be able to tell you how many degrees you see when you look through the lens. If the object is bright enough, you can project it on a white screen-like paper, and when it's projected it's easy to measure with a ruler.
 
Alright, I'll look into that. I ordered the telescope tuesday, so it should be here by monday.
 
Can you take the lens out of a webcam and hold it up to the scope?
 
Whatever the set up .. and answer is not trivial:

.. Sensitivity of you measuring device may be affected by a number of environmental changes. Look at this carefully.

.. Recalibrate your system often .. or .. each time you suspect a change in the setup.

.. try to develop a procedure that can be repeated easily

.. whatever procedure you use, assert what the practical minimum resolution is for your set up. For example: use the separation of binary stars for various conditions of "seeing."

The following is suggested

-- Point the scope at some **distant** terrestrial object which can be independently measured.

-- or point the scope at pair of stars whose angle of separation is known.

-- or point the scope at a large crater on the Moon whose diameter can be found.

-- or pair of very small craters .. on the Moon whose separation can be found.

Try several procedures .. several times and look for consistent scale. However, If you change the set up (which might include a change of temperature -- hence a change of focal length) then you'll have to recalibrate.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top