Quick Divergence Theorem question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying the divergence theorem to evaluate the flux of the vector field V through a hemisphere. The divergence of V is calculated as 1, leading to a volume integral over the hemisphere that results in 2πa³/3. Participants express confusion about the distinction between flux and flux density, with some clarifying that the divergence represents flux density. The hint suggests that a direct evaluation of the flux may not be the easiest approach, prompting a discussion on the correct interpretation of the problem. Overall, the thread highlights common misunderstandings in vector calculus, particularly regarding the divergence theorem.
Stef42
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the divergence theorem in three dimensions

\int\int\int\nabla\bullet V d\tau= \int \int V \bullet n d \sigma

to evaluate the flux of the vector field

V= (3x-2y)i + x4zj + (1-2z)k

through the hemisphere bounded by the spherical surface x2+y2+z2=a2 (for z>0) and the x-y plane

Hint: The direct evauation of the flux may not be the easiest way to proceed

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I found it pretty simple which means I probably messed up (and I'm not sure what the hint is talking about
ok so the divergence is
\nabla \bullet V = 3-2=1

and the integral over the volume of the hemisphere (using spherical polar coordinates) is
\int_{0}^a r^2 d \tau \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\phi \int_{0}^{\pi/2} sin\theta d\theta = \frac{2\pi a^3}{3}

So am I doing it completely wrong? I don't know the answer but if anyone could look through it and spot anything I would really appreciate it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Stef42! :smile:

(have a del: ∇ and a theta: θ and a phi: φ and a sigma: σ and use \cdot instead of \bullet :wink:)
Stef42 said:
Use the divergence theorem in three dimensions

\int\int\int\nabla\bullet V d\tau= \int \int V \bullet n d \sigma

to evaluate the flux of the vector field

Hint: The direct evauation of the flux may not be the easiest way to proceed

I found it pretty simple which means I probably messed up (and I'm not sure what the hint is talking about

Looks fine to me …

I think the hint just means don't use V.n, which is the flux, use ∇.V … though that's a bit unnecessary since they've already told you to :rolleyes:
 
thanks for the speedy response tiny-tim :-)
Ok so just to clear up:
∇.V= divergence of vector field V
V.n= flux
So then the sigma integral is flux density ?
So what did I calculate? flux density aswell? wasn't I supposed to find the flux? :confused:
 
Stef42 said:
So what did I calculate? flux density aswell? wasn't I supposed to find the flux? :confused:

oooh, I get confused between flux and flux density …

anyway, V.n is definitely fluxy, and ∇.V definitely isn't :wink:
 
well, at least I'm not the only one who gets confused, damn vector calculus :frown:
well from my lectures notes:
"The divergence represents the flux density of the vector field and, because of the derivative operation, has an associated Fundamental Theorem of Calculus called the divergence theorem : (quotes equation)"

hmm think I'll go talk to him tomorrow :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top