Quick question on calculating wavelength.

  • Thread starter Thread starter lyrebird
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavelength
lyrebird
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light strikes a sodium surface, causing photoelectric emission. The stopping potential for the ejected electrons is 4.6 V, and the work function of sodium is 2.2 eV. What is the wavelength of the incident light?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Problem solved, thanks. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation E=hf for the energy of a photon of frequency f, will give energy in joules. (if h is in SI units)
So the work function and maximum ke of electrons (given by the stopping potential) also need to be in joules.
 
Stonebridge said:
The equation E=hf for the energy of a photon of frequency f, will give energy in joules. (if h is in SI units)
So the work function and maximum ke of electrons (given by the stopping potential) also need to be in joules.

To calculate the maximum kinetic energy, I would just multiply the charge on an electron by the stopping potential 4.6V, wouldn't I?
 
lyrebird said:
To calculate the maximum kinetic energy, I would just multiply the charge on an electron by the stopping potential 4.6V, wouldn't I?

Yes. That's correct. It's the same idea as calculating the k.e. an electron gains when accelerating through a potential V. The only difference here is that the electric field acts to decelerate the electron rather than accelerate it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top