Radius probability of random cut hemisphere.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average length of the radius of a randomly cut cross-section of a hemisphere, particularly one that includes the pole. A numerical approach yielded a result of 0.7855 times the original radius. The analytical solution involves integrating the function sqrt(1-x^2) from 0 to R, leading to the formula πR/4 for the average radius. The complexity of the integral is acknowledged, with one participant noting their reliance on Mathematica for assistance. The conversation highlights the blend of numerical and analytical methods in solving geometric probability problems.
quasi426
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Imagine viewing a hemisphere normal to the equator such that it looks like a circile with the full radius of the hemisphere. Now randomly section or cut the hemisphere in a manner a tomato is sliced. If we only consider the portion of the hemisphere that contains the pole we should be generating a smaller radius then the full radius given we actually cut something off.

My question is the following:
What is the average length of the radius of a randomly cut cross-section?

I did this numerically and obtained 0.7855 of the original radius. What is the analytical approach? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just do some integration .
You will get
\frac{\pi R}{4}
where R is the radius of the sphere
 
Last edited:
Ah I see, I just integrate sqrt(1-x^2) from 0 to R. That's a tough integral though for a guy who hasn't done much calculus in 3 years, I was lazy and used mathematica to obtain the solution. Makes me feel like I would be useless in a deserted island. Thanks for the help.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top